2017
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Greener and Safer Plasticizers: A 4-Step Approach

Abstract: The health and economic burden of endocrine disrupting chemicals, such as the plasticizer di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), is prompting industry to develop alternatives. However, the absence of requirements for manufacturers to ensure the safety of these alternatives has led to the generation of replacements that may have similar or worse effects than the original chemicals. Consequently, there is increasing recognition by scientists, regulators and industry that proactive approaches are needed to develop sa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to rapidly enhance the properties of a chemical has tremendous potential for treating cancer, enhancing medical and structural materials, and controlling dangerous infectious agents. Importantly, this technology has paved the way for “green chemistry”, a healthier future achieved by engineering chemicals to ensure against hazardous effects (e.g., [67]). Currently, however, regulatory agencies charged with assessing chemical safety cannot keep pace with the introduction of new chemicals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to rapidly enhance the properties of a chemical has tremendous potential for treating cancer, enhancing medical and structural materials, and controlling dangerous infectious agents. Importantly, this technology has paved the way for “green chemistry”, a healthier future achieved by engineering chemicals to ensure against hazardous effects (e.g., [67]). Currently, however, regulatory agencies charged with assessing chemical safety cannot keep pace with the introduction of new chemicals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous studies, we used a 4-step approach to identify greener replacements for DEHP with desirable plasticizing properties, biodegradability, minimal leaching, and fewer deleterious effects. We identified 2 candidate compounds, 1,4butanediol dibenzoate (BDB) and dioctyl succinate (DOS), that did not cause significant physiological perturbations in several immortalized cell lines or after acute exposure in vivo (Albert et al, 2018;Boisvert et al, 2016;Nardelli et al, 2015). Recently, we demonstrated that in utero and lactational exposure to BDB and DOS did not produce the phenotypes described after exposure to DEHP from gestational day (GD) 8 to post-natal day (PND) 3, 8, or 21 (Nardelli et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three of the four compounds were as effective, or indeed, more effective than commercially-available DEHP in all but one tested material property. In combination with previous studies that showed rapid environmental degradability [21,24,30] and a low toxicity profile [26,27,28,29,35], 1,5-pentanediol dibenzoate in particular stands out as a good candidate green plasticizer to replace DEHP, in addition to 1,3-propanediol dibenzoate and 1,6-hexanediol dibenzoate. Further, while 1,4-butanediol dibenzoate is not a good candidate for a drop-in replacement of DEHP, due to its observed material hardening, this study suggests its use as a reversible heat-activated plasticizer or processing aid, with excellent plasticizer properties at mildly elevated temperatures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Further, the proposed diol dibenzoate compounds could be good green candidates to replace phthalates, given previous work that identified their rapid biodegradation by soil bacteria [21,24,30]. Several toxicological in-vitro studies have also suggested a low hazard associated with these compounds [26,27,28,29,35], yet a more thorough toxicological analysis would likely be needed to confirm these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%