2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74721-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying indoor radon sources in Pa Miang, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Abstract: Radon is the leading source of lung cancer mortality after smoking in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Finding a source of carcinogens is one of the important measures for preventing the cancer risk for this region. Specific sites at Pa Miang, Doi Saket have the highest incidences of lung cancer and have a combination of factors that influence indoor radon concentration. Our study identified the sources of indoor radon within several houses. The results indicate that geological and topographic characteristics, including … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This average, T, was used to estimate AED, which ranged between 0.44 and 12.18 mSv y −1 and an average of 4.27 mSv y −1 , which is approximately 3 times higher than the global average AED of 1.3 mSv y −1 15 . This value is also higher than the previously reported measurements in Pa Miang, Chiang Mai province, where it ranged between 0.9—3.8 mSv y −1 29 . The AED of lung cancer cases was significantly higher than those of healthy controls (p = 0.032), with AED values of case and controls at 4.28 ± 3.0 and 4.11 ± 3.0 mSv y −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This average, T, was used to estimate AED, which ranged between 0.44 and 12.18 mSv y −1 and an average of 4.27 mSv y −1 , which is approximately 3 times higher than the global average AED of 1.3 mSv y −1 15 . This value is also higher than the previously reported measurements in Pa Miang, Chiang Mai province, where it ranged between 0.9—3.8 mSv y −1 29 . The AED of lung cancer cases was significantly higher than those of healthy controls (p = 0.032), with AED values of case and controls at 4.28 ± 3.0 and 4.11 ± 3.0 mSv y −1 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…To estimate the indoor radon value for all eight provinces, the geostatistical Kriging interpolation was used to create a radon distribution map. As the UNT region is located in different radon potential basin areas of granite, there is abundant uranium and its decay products around this area 29 , 30 . Reportedly, granitic gneiss has high frequency ratios for radon levels 31 , 32 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than the black shale, siliclastic sedimentary rocks and sediments, in contrast, were associated with low indoor radon levels. Others have reported associations between bedrock lithology, mineralogy, geologic structures such as faults, and indoor radon measurements in different geologic settings and parts of the world [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, water consumption is the primary cause of 222 Rn exposure through the ingestion pathway, whereas the emanation of 222 Rn from water causes exposure through the inhalation of air. As 222 Rn is loosely soluble in water, it can easily emanate from water to air [ 7 ]. For that reason, 222 Rn activity measurement in water is necessary to protect people from radiological hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%