1996
DOI: 10.1080/00050069608260187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying intellectual disability: Some problems in the measurement of intelligence and adaptive behaviour

Abstract: efinitions of intellectual disability have traditionally depended on psychometric conceptions of intelligenceD and the use, with varying degrees of flexibility, of cut-off scores on intelligence tests. More recently, deficits in adaptive behaviour as well as in intelligence have been incorporated into definitions of intellectual disability in Australia as well as overseas, and identification is directed towards establishing support needs rather than identifying group or category membership. This paper explores… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this, intellectual disability cannot be assumed because other criteria for intellectual disability were not assessed. Thirdly, Wechsler scales (i.e., WASI) are culturally biased and are not considered appropriate for use with people from UNDERSTANDING OF THE LEGAL PROCESS indigenous backgrounds or other minority groups because they understate their intelligence (Emerson, 1998;Hayes, 1993;Jenkinson, 1996). Fourthly, background information obtained from the participants was self-report and was not corroborated by official records, which leads to issues of potentially unreliable information.…”
Section: Felicity Parton Andrew Day and Jack Whitementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given this, intellectual disability cannot be assumed because other criteria for intellectual disability were not assessed. Thirdly, Wechsler scales (i.e., WASI) are culturally biased and are not considered appropriate for use with people from UNDERSTANDING OF THE LEGAL PROCESS indigenous backgrounds or other minority groups because they understate their intelligence (Emerson, 1998;Hayes, 1993;Jenkinson, 1996). Fourthly, background information obtained from the participants was self-report and was not corroborated by official records, which leads to issues of potentially unreliable information.…”
Section: Felicity Parton Andrew Day and Jack Whitementioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, adaptive functioning measures assess whether individuals volunteer for extra work or avoid lying. Although these behaviors may be viewed positively by many members of society, Jenkinson () notes that “many people… survive quite adequately without them [prosocial behaviors]” (p. 99). Indeed, it is likely that many offenders without mental retardation would not endorse these items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While norm-referenced monitoring is important for funding and legislative purposes, the skills and development of students with additional needs also need to be monitored for curriculum and development of individual learning plans. There have been concerns about the use of IQ tests as measures of ability for educational purposes (e.g., Gould, 1996), especially among people with cognitive disabilities (Jenkinson, 1996;Koegh, Bernheimer, & Guthrie, 1997). IQ tests do not take into account individual differences in functioning, learning styles and environmental considerations, and are often interpreted in ways that make sense to clinicians, but not to teachers, students or parents.…”
Section: Abstract: Emotional Development Assessment Special Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%