2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07515-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying key differences between linear stochastic estimation and neural networks for fluid flow regressions

Abstract: Neural networks (NNs) and linear stochastic estimation (LSE) have widely been utilized as powerful tools for fluid-flow regressions. We investigate fundamental differences between them considering two canonical fluid-flow problems: (1) the estimation of high-order proper orthogonal decomposition coefficients from low-order their counterparts for a flow around a two-dimensional cylinder, and (2) the state estimation from wall characteristics in a turbulent channel flow. In the first problem, we compare the perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparing high-quality input data is essential for successfully reconstructing turbulent flows. However, it is necessary to assess the robustness and sensitivity of the models against noisy inputs [182]. This point will be important as machine-learning-based super-resolution analyses become utilized in industrial applications [183].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparing high-quality input data is essential for successfully reconstructing turbulent flows. However, it is necessary to assess the robustness and sensitivity of the models against noisy inputs [182]. This point will be important as machine-learning-based super-resolution analyses become utilized in industrial applications [183].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, consider the nonlinear wavelet decomposition (see e.g. Farge & Schneider, 2006), or more recent data-driven methods, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) POD (see Guastoni et al, 2021;Güemes, Discetti, & Ianiro, 2019;Nakamura, Fukami, & Fukagata, 2022). A CNN POD method considers the same spatial basis as traditional POD; however, the time coefficients are estimated using a CNN, making it able to account for nonlinear features in the flow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, SVD can be performed on large data sets of X = [x 1 x 2 • • • x m ] ∈ C n×m to extract dominant patterns from low-dimensional approximations to high dimensions for that data set (Brunton and Kuts, 2022;Nakamura et al, 2022). Eigenvectors can be extracted from m sets of measured values or image data as the row components, where the column components are individual measured values or image data converted to a one-dimensional array as x ∈ C n .…”
Section: Inference Accuracy For Low-dimensional Svd Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%