Identifying Key Financial, Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG), Bond, and COVID-19 Factors Affecting Global Shipping Companies—A Hybrid Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making Method

Abstract

The international shipping industry is the largest transportation system in the world. However, shipping stock prices were highly volatile during the 2020–2021 COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to identify the causal relationships of the four dimensions (financial performance, bond financing, environmental, social, governance, and COVID-19) and 20 criteria affecting the sustainability of global shipping companies. The research scope includes a sample of nine listed international shipping companies accounting for 49% of the global market share with data collected from 2010 to 2020. Survey responses from 15 investment experts were also obtained. We applied a hybrid multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) method integrating the Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), analytic network process, and modified VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno techniques to be the DANP-mV model to identify the causal relationships among the dimensions and criteria, providing ways of narrowing the performance gaps of shipping companies. The results indicate that financial performance is the main cause affecting COVID-19 and ESG practices. The ESG practices influence bond financing. The largest performance gaps across shipping companies include earnings per share (EPS), yield to maturity, corporate social responsibility (CSR), and timely delivery. The findings of this study suggest that shipping companies may focus on gross profit margin to improve EPS, term to maturity to enhance yield to maturity, social distancing policy to meet timely delivery, and the board size to enhance corporate social responsibility (CSR). The outcome of this study aids shipping companies in prioritizing their resources and investors in selecting shipping company stocks in response to COVID-19.

Strategic Pathways to Decarbonization: Socio-Technical System Innovations for Green Shipping Compliance with IMO 2050 Targets

“…ESG practices, rooted in environmental justice theory, serve as a means for shipping companies to operate sustainably and equitably across the environmental, social, and governance domains. It is imperative for shipping companies to strategically adopt and implement ESG principles to fulfill their environmental responsibilities and promote environmental justice in the long term, thereby laying the groundwork for future generations [16]. In turn, by fulfilling their environmental responsibilities, shipping companies should achieve equitable distribution, which is a core principle of environmental justice, including minimizing GHG emissions from ships and preventing marine pollution [17].…”

Strategic Pathways to Alternative Marine Fuels: Empirical Evidence from Shipping Practices in South Korea

“…ESG practices, rooted in environmental justice theory, serve as a means for shipping companies to operate sustainably and equitably across the environmental, social, and governance domains. It is imperative for shipping companies to strategically adopt and implement ESG principles to fulfill their environmental responsibilities and promote environmental justice in the long term, thereby laying the groundwork for future generations [25]. In turn, by fulfilling their environmental responsibilities, shipping companies should achieve equitable distribution, which is a core principle of environmental justice, including minimizing GHG emissions from ships and preventing marine pollution [26].…”

Accounting, ESG dynamics and the pandemic: when the quality of disclosure becomes crucial to sustainable success

“…High disclosure quality could represent a pivotal starting point for more robust future conjectures. Consider the current COVID-19 pandemic as an example: had reporting standards and internal control systems been more informed regarding the environmental, eco-system, health and climate impacts that corporations all over the world have on our planet, some of the challenges we are facing today – such as climate change or, possibly, the pandemic itself – could have been anticipated (Geiger et al , 2021; Tettamanzi et al , 2022; Lin et al , 2022). Hence, the impact of the pandemic on business activities and business models definitively entails rethinking reporting practices because the latter play a crucial role in the growth opportunities, the strategy and the sustainable success of the former.…”

“…2.1.1 The concept of disruptive event. A disruptive event is an organization-wide emergency or disaster that is not covered by routine measures: it could arise from environmental catastrophes, political controversies or irregular leadership changes, as well as from particular mergers and acquisitions processes or even business model conversions (Ku et al, 2020;Lin et al, 2022), causing changesfrom a corporate perspectiveto a company's structure or operating model by putting new demands on internal functions (Geiger et al, 2021;Comoli et al, 2023). A disruptive event also presents significant challenges to population health and welfare on a global scale due to its extensive origins.…”