2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying manufacturability and machining processes using deep 3D convolutional networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generating high-quality 3D CAD models can also help analyze machinability and manufacturing. Peddireddy et al [11] reported that being able to generate a triangularly tessellated surface (STL) from the 3D CAD model can be used to predict the manufacturability of the CAD design and machining processes. However, working with highly complex surfaces is a constant challenge for designers.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generating high-quality 3D CAD models can also help analyze machinability and manufacturing. Peddireddy et al [11] reported that being able to generate a triangularly tessellated surface (STL) from the 3D CAD model can be used to predict the manufacturability of the CAD design and machining processes. However, working with highly complex surfaces is a constant challenge for designers.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blue box in the second image is a region of interest (ROI) and the black patch is a manually marked mask denoting the background color. Detailed operations and finer touch-ups of the GrabCut algorithm can be found in [11].…”
Section: Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarized all the cantilever beam models provided in [4] and created a parameterized synthetic FEA simulation dataset. According to [26,27], we provide uniform random values to provide design parameters for cantilever beams to improve the repeatability and portability of the dataset. Details on dataset preparation are explained in this section.…”
Section: Dataset Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the generated cantilevered structures cannot represent all the beam structures, the selected ones represent the most common structures in the mechanical areas [4]. Also, following the similar parametric design pattern, other features can be considered and added into the dataset in the future according to previous synthetic CAD design researches [26,27].…”
Section: Stress Field Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%