2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying microstructural changes responsible for retarded grain growth during tungsten recrystallization after helium plasma exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the reason for the lower measured hardness in this case, since the greater load in the present case resulted in a larger indentation depth, hence a smaller indentation size effect [41]. However, the results show the same general trend as in that work, except for the fact that the drop in hardness after annealing at 1200 • C is much greater for the unexposed sample than the plasma-exposed sample in this case, in contrast to the previous work [29]. Thus, the present work demonstrates more clearly the effect of plasma exposure on retarding recrystallization than before.…”
Section: Nanoindentationsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is the reason for the lower measured hardness in this case, since the greater load in the present case resulted in a larger indentation depth, hence a smaller indentation size effect [41]. However, the results show the same general trend as in that work, except for the fact that the drop in hardness after annealing at 1200 • C is much greater for the unexposed sample than the plasma-exposed sample in this case, in contrast to the previous work [29]. Thus, the present work demonstrates more clearly the effect of plasma exposure on retarding recrystallization than before.…”
Section: Nanoindentationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…of observations. The hardness values here are measured with a much higher load than in the previous paper, where the maximum load was 10,000 µN or ~1 gf [29]. This is the reason for the lower measured hardness in this case, since the greater load in the present case resulted in a larger indentation depth, hence a smaller indentation size effect [41].…”
Section: Nanoindentationmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations