2016
DOI: 10.1186/s41039-016-0036-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying middle school students’ challenges in computational thinking-based science learning

Abstract: Computational thinking (CT) parallels the core practices of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education and is believed to effectively support students' learning of science and math concepts. However, despite the synergies between CT and STEM education, integrating the two to support synergistic learning remains an important challenge. Relatively, little is known about how a student's conceptual understanding develops in such learning environments and the difficulties they face when lear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This information may have affected the stated self-efficacy. Basu et al, 2016 Science, biology, mathematics…”
Section: Jaipal-mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This information may have affected the stated self-efficacy. Basu et al, 2016 Science, biology, mathematics…”
Section: Jaipal-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational thinking is inter-disciplinary in nature (Yadav et al, 2017), so it makes good sense to continue practicing it in primary school or even early education, where all subjects are naturally blended together in the same environment for students. CT skills are widely used in various subjects such as arts and linguistic studies (Cheng et al, 2008;Grover & Pea, 2013;Sáez-López & Sevillano-García, 2017), social studies (Güven & Gulbahar, 2020;Hammond et al, 2020), music (Essl, 2007;Moore, 2015;Shafer & Skripchuk, 2020), STEM subjects (Basu et al, 2016;Jaipal-Jamani & Angeli, 2016;J. Leonard et al, 2016;Miller, 2019;Serrano Pérez & Juárez López, 2018), and physical education (Leonard et al, 2020;Parmar et al, 2017).…”
Section: Subjects Which Applied Ct In Stem Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a preliminary step, this study focuses on examining 3rd grade lesson plans at Code.org, a popular and non-profit educational site providing activities and curriculum for K-12 computer science. The focus on initiatives designed for 3rd graders is important and purposeful because (a) elementary school years, in general, are considered key for cognitive and social development as well as interest regarding future STEM engagement (Basu et al., 2016; K–12 Computer Science Framework & K–12CS. , 2016) and (b) 3rd grade, especially, is viewed as a key milestone when learners not only progress from learning basic skills (e.g., reading) to using them for building more complex ones (e.g., reading to learn) but also can display skills correlated with their educational outcomes at higher level grades (Lesnick et al., 2010).…”
Section: Purpose and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robots in educational settings have attracted many researchers to study their effects [19,20]. Introducing robots into the classroom is expected to provide multiple benefits in support of learning activities to promote student interest in STEM discipline and can be used to convey technical competencies, such as programming skills [1,21]. Besides, the understudy can get essential cross-over aptitudes, such as day-by-day critical thinking exercises, dynamic, correspondence, collaboration, and may apply to numerous other STEM learning areas [13,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%