2022
DOI: 10.1080/13467581.2022.2145216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying online learning experience of architecture students for a smart education environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attention has been drawn to the factors that make a student's design learning experience challenging. These include the inability of the tutor to observe the design process directly, the difficulty of initiating peer evaluations is harder in digital environments compared to in a physical studio and the weakening of social interactions between students (Asadpour, 2021;Cho et al, 2023;Yorgancıoğlu, 2020). It is also striking that the changing cognitive dimensions of design learning have not been examined in depth in studio pedagogy research conducted in pre-or post-pandemic period.…”
Section: The Understanding and Methodology Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attention has been drawn to the factors that make a student's design learning experience challenging. These include the inability of the tutor to observe the design process directly, the difficulty of initiating peer evaluations is harder in digital environments compared to in a physical studio and the weakening of social interactions between students (Asadpour, 2021;Cho et al, 2023;Yorgancıoğlu, 2020). It is also striking that the changing cognitive dimensions of design learning have not been examined in depth in studio pedagogy research conducted in pre-or post-pandemic period.…”
Section: The Understanding and Methodology Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…teaching, social, and cognitive. Cho (2023) argues that in the context of online learning, spatial presence is also crucial, as students' physical presence may influence how they learn. Archambault, Leary & Rice (2022) identify five pillars of online pedagogy which include building relationships and community, incorporating active learning, leveraging learner agency, embracing mastery learning, and personalizing the learning process.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allu-Kangkum (2021) highlights some key challenges for architecture schools in adapting to online learning environments, which include lack of hands-on experience, difficulty in replicating studio culture, limited access to specialized software and equipment, challenges in delivering design critiques and feedback, inadequate internet connectivity and infrastructure, social isolation and lack of interaction, challenges in assessing design work, and inadequate electricity supply and internet/data affordability in developing countries. Cho (2023) notes that depending on their experience in physical classrooms, first-and second-year architecture students had significantly distainct remote learning experiences than third-to fifth-year students (Cho, Lee & Kim, 2023).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%