“…Similarly, for computerised detection of hind limb lameness, studies have focussed either on the quantification of sacrum movement asymmetry (Buchner et al, 1996;Kramer et al, 2000Peham et al, 2001;Audigie et al, 2002;Church et al, 2009) or comparative tubera coxae movement asymmetry (May and Wyn-Jones, 1987;Kramer et al, 2000;Church et al, 2009). Studies that used both approaches came to varying conclusions regarding optimal landmark choice and asymmetry features (Buchner et al, 1996;Kramer et al, 2000;Church et al, 2009;Starke et al, 2012c;Starke et al, 2013;Pfau et al, 2014). To date, these studies have not tested the basic mechanics that form the foundation for the response to lameness and association between different measures.…”