2019
DOI: 10.1088/2040-8986/ab2586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying orbital angular momentum modes in turbulence with high accuracy via machine learning

Abstract: The orbital angular momentum (OAM) of a Laguerre–Gaussian beam (LGB) is classified using the support vector machine (SVM) model. The scintillation index, beam width, and beam wander of the Gaussian beam and the LGB at the receiving site are taken as feature vectors, and the OAM number of a LGB is taken as the label in the training and test samples. The influences on the detection accuracy of the number of training samples, the transmission distance, and the different ways of grouping OAM values are analyzed, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[66] 2016 SOM They achieved the transmission and detection of OAM modes over a distance of 143 km, which is the maximum distance achieved experimentally. [74] 2019 SVM The detection accuracy of a single SVM model in severe turbulent environments (1 × 10 −13 m −2/3 ) is close to 100% within 2500 m. [75] 2020 SVM A linear SVM was used to classify experimental images, giving rising to an average accuracy of 98%. [80] 2016 FNN This network offered a detecting accuracy of >74% for 110 OAM superposition states.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[66] 2016 SOM They achieved the transmission and detection of OAM modes over a distance of 143 km, which is the maximum distance achieved experimentally. [74] 2019 SVM The detection accuracy of a single SVM model in severe turbulent environments (1 × 10 −13 m −2/3 ) is close to 100% within 2500 m. [75] 2020 SVM A linear SVM was used to classify experimental images, giving rising to an average accuracy of 98%. [80] 2016 FNN This network offered a detecting accuracy of >74% for 110 OAM superposition states.…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffraction method detects OAM patterns by designing special diffractive optics and measuring the far-field diffraction pattern after the vortex beam passes through the diffractive element. In addition, the support vector machine learning model can achieve the recognition effect by extracting sample features [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ], but when the sample size is large, the recognition effect is saturated. The spiral wavefront phase of the vortex beam is susceptible to turbulence, resulting in pattern dispersion and intensity distortion, which in turn leads to the distortion of interference or diffraction fringes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both CNN and FNN have high accuracy, but there are limitations due to the quest for large training samples and high complexity. On the other hand, the machine learning technique has a good robustness with small datasets and it is capable of extracting the feature vector of trained samples [24][25][26]. Investigation shows that spatial distribution of OAM beams under ocean turbulence can be identified by analyzing the phase space distribution of the beams under turbulence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%