Abstract:Background
The association between fear of pain (FOP) and pain intensity has remained unclear. This study aimed to examine whether highly pain‐fearful participants showed pain perceptual biases to general painful stimulus or to specific threatening painful stimulus.
Methods
Fifty‐nine undergraduates were recruited into low (n = 30) and high (n = 29) FOP groups and completed a threatening pain perception task with two tasks. Task 1 assessed pain perceptual biases by calculating the percentage of near‐threshold … Show more
“…3,13 "Şiddetli ağrı korkusu" (1,3,5,6,9,10,13,18,25,27. maddeler), "hafif ağrı korkusu" (2,4,7,12,19,22,23,24,28,30. maddeler) ve "tıbbi ağrı korkusu" (8,11,14,15,16,17,20,21,26,29.…”
Ağrı, var olan veya potansiyel doku hasarı ile ilişkili olabilen, hoş olmayan duyusal ve duygusal bir deneyimdir. Ağrı süreci, dokunun hasar görmesi ile başlayan akut bir süreç olup, iyileşme gerçekleştiğinde sona ermektedir. Bazı durumlarda, oluşan hasarın iyileşmesine ve herhangi bir uyaran olma-masına rağmen ağrı devam etmektedir. Bu durumun 3 aydan fazla sürmesi, kronik ağrı olarak tanımlanmaktadır. 1,2 Çoğu birey, günlük hayatta ağrıyı deneyimlemektedir. Kişinin ağrı deneyiminin olumlu veya olumsuz olması ağrı algısını şekillendirir. Bu durum,
“…3,13 "Şiddetli ağrı korkusu" (1,3,5,6,9,10,13,18,25,27. maddeler), "hafif ağrı korkusu" (2,4,7,12,19,22,23,24,28,30. maddeler) ve "tıbbi ağrı korkusu" (8,11,14,15,16,17,20,21,26,29.…”
Ağrı, var olan veya potansiyel doku hasarı ile ilişkili olabilen, hoş olmayan duyusal ve duygusal bir deneyimdir. Ağrı süreci, dokunun hasar görmesi ile başlayan akut bir süreç olup, iyileşme gerçekleştiğinde sona ermektedir. Bazı durumlarda, oluşan hasarın iyileşmesine ve herhangi bir uyaran olma-masına rağmen ağrı devam etmektedir. Bu durumun 3 aydan fazla sürmesi, kronik ağrı olarak tanımlanmaktadır. 1,2 Çoğu birey, günlük hayatta ağrıyı deneyimlemektedir. Kişinin ağrı deneyiminin olumlu veya olumsuz olması ağrı algısını şekillendirir. Bu durum,
“…Yang and Bateer [20] recruited 59 university students to receive painful stimuli in the dorsum of the left hand via two electrodes and looked at self-reported measures (Fear of Pain Questionnaire, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, STAI-T) in relation to their pain experience [20]. The researchers concluded that high fear of pain groups reported higher pain intensity in conjunction with higher anxiety levels when compared to the low fear of pain groups.…”
Section: Personality and Pain Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researchers concluded that high fear of pain groups reported higher pain intensity in conjunction with higher anxiety levels when compared to the low fear of pain groups. The authors found that threat appraisal of pain played an important role in the association between pain-related fear and pain perceptual biases [20].…”
Section: Personality and Pain Correlationmentioning
Personality type can influence pain perception and prognosis. Therefore, it is important for clinicians to consider personality factors that may influence outcomes and understand personality inventories to garner a better understanding of how an individual may perceive pain. This paper explores different elements that contribute to low back pain (LBP) and evaluates a personality inventory reported in the medical literature. Understanding how to evaluate personality type as well as how to approach clinical interactions based on personality may help to provide context for the unique needs of individual patients when developing a plan of care to treat LBP.
“…Personal traits such as being fearful of the anticipation or the experience of pain may account for interindividual differences in reporting or perceiving pain 11 . Picture a parent faced with the task of taking their child to the dentist for a major dental procedure.…”
The intensity of noxious stimuli usually shapes the perception of discomfort or pain. Here, we compare three mechanistic accounts of how cued expectation about stimulus intensity may modulate behavioral reports of discomfort: response gain, input gain or baseline shift. In two behavioral sessions, thirty-nine healthy participants rated a series of 160 uncomfortable electrical stimuli (UES) applied to the skin of the forearm, preceded by a visual cue indicating the intensity of the upcoming stimulus as 'weak' or 'strong'. Cue contingency of 65% or 70% varied between the two sessions to investigate the effect of informativeness on putative modulatory cueing effects.
We found that verbal cueing of the expectation of an upcoming UES biased subjects' ratings towards the expected outcome. A Bayes factor analysis revealed that of the three putative modulatory processes, the baseline shift model received the strongest support from our empirical data. Manipulating the level of contingency of the cue did not further alter the results.
We conclude that, within the parameters of our experiment, expectations influence the perception of the UES independently of stimulus intensity. Extending these findings to a clinical context may improve our understanding of hypersensitivity in chronic pain patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.