2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.05.29.22275652
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying patients presenting in pain to the adult emergency department: A binary classification task and description of prevalence

Abstract: BackgroundAccurate, reliable and efficient measures of pain-related presentations are essential to evaluate and improve pain care in the ED. Estimates of pain prevalence on arrival to the emergency department (ED) vary depending on the methods used. Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches are likely to be the future for identifying patients in pain from electronic health records (EHR). However, we need a robust method to identify these patients before this can occur. This study aims to identify patients presen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The outcome of this deployment is that the prevalence of pain on arrival was identified as 55.16% of all presentations to the ED, with a significant difference between pre-and post-pandemic prevalence. Pain remains the most common symptom on presentation to the ED, with over 55% of all patients experiencing pain on arrival in this department (4). Fundamentally the patient arriving in pain to the ED is different in terms of age, sex, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, residence, and urgency to those not in pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The outcome of this deployment is that the prevalence of pain on arrival was identified as 55.16% of all presentations to the ED, with a significant difference between pre-and post-pandemic prevalence. Pain remains the most common symptom on presentation to the ED, with over 55% of all patients experiencing pain on arrival in this department (4). Fundamentally the patient arriving in pain to the ED is different in terms of age, sex, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, residence, and urgency to those not in pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inadequate documentation about pain and pain intensity can have immediate consequences for the quality of clinical care, and ongoing consequences for research and quality improvement because it makes it difficult to identify patients who have presented in pain. Instead, researchers typically rely on indirect measures, such as diagnosis or the administration of analgesic medication, to identify their target cohort when auditing medical records (4). However, such indirect measures will likely introduce bias into any resulting samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evaluating the effectiveness of pain management in the ED has been difficult due to a lack of appropriate tools. The recent adaptation (8) and validation (9) of the Revised American Pain Society -Patient Outcome Questionnaire in the ED setting (APS-POQ-RED) provides the means to assess the usage and effectiveness of pain relief in the ED including non-pharmacological analgesia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pain is the most common symptom in people who present to emergency departments (ED) (1, 2). However, due to a lack of well-validated tools to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of pain care in the ED setting, outcomes of pain care from the perspective of the patient are not well understood (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%