2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying potential conservation areas in the Cuitzeo Lake basin, Mexico by multitemporal analysis of landscape connectivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The IIC integrates into a single value of connectivity, the area of fragments of native vegetation (hereafter habitat patches), and the connectivity of the landscape [61]. The habitat patches of the focal species are represented as nodes, and the topological relations or connections between them are represented as links based on graph theory [62]. The values of IIC range from 0 to 1, increasing as the connectivity improves, thus a value of 1 would be reached in the hypothetical case of a landscape being totally occupied by the habitat.…”
Section: Determining the Distance Threshold For Landscape Connectivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IIC integrates into a single value of connectivity, the area of fragments of native vegetation (hereafter habitat patches), and the connectivity of the landscape [61]. The habitat patches of the focal species are represented as nodes, and the topological relations or connections between them are represented as links based on graph theory [62]. The values of IIC range from 0 to 1, increasing as the connectivity improves, thus a value of 1 would be reached in the hypothetical case of a landscape being totally occupied by the habitat.…”
Section: Determining the Distance Threshold For Landscape Connectivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evitar la fragmentación de los hábitats y mantener la conectividad son prioridades de conservación para proteger la biodiversidad de los ecosistemas (Vos et al, 2008;Lindemayer et al, 2012;Correa-Ayram et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…The resistance distance method solves part of these problems because it considers different levels of suitability for the dispersion of plants and animals (McRae and Kavanagh, 2006), from hostile environments to different patch mosaics (Thiele et al, 2018a). This approach is advantageous because it explains the random movements in the landscape, considering more than one possible path (McRae and Kavanagh, 2006; Thiele et al, 2018a), and providing solid data for conservation planning and decision making (Correa Ayram et al, 2014; Fuller et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%