2014
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying "Preperimetric" Glaucoma in Standard Automated Perimetry Visual Fields

Abstract: Differences exist between healthy VFs and VFs of preperimetric glaucoma eyes, which go on to develop manifest glaucoma; these two groups of VFs could be well distinguished by using the Random Forests classifier.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a study that classified between glaucomatous and healthy eyes using random forest performed with an AROC of 0.79. 20 This result was slightly underwhelming when taking into account that over 60% of the data was glaucomatous. This means that a classifier performing by chance would produce an AROC of ~0.60.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, a study that classified between glaucomatous and healthy eyes using random forest performed with an AROC of 0.79. 20 This result was slightly underwhelming when taking into account that over 60% of the data was glaucomatous. This means that a classifier performing by chance would produce an AROC of ~0.60.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, to evaluate the relationships between VRQoL-related parameters and BCVA, as well as between VRQoL-related parameters and VF damage in various subfields, it is important to control for such inter-correlations. The advantage of the Random Forest algorithm 21 , used in the current study, is that it can control for inter-correlation of multiple explanatory variables; thus, it is particularly useful in analysing data that include test results obtained from various subfields of the VF 17,25,26 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A minimum 2 tests were performed to minimize the learning effect; if any 2 tests failed to satisfy the reliability criteria defined by the perimeter (false positive, false negative, and loss of fixation), the test was repeated. The Anderson-Patella criteria was used with 3 non edge points depressed to an extent of what is present in <5% of normal population with at least 1 point of these 3 depressed to an extent found in less than 1% of normal population, pattern standard deviation and corrected pattern standard deviation (PSD/CPSD) should be that found in <5% population and glaucoma hemifield test (GHT) should be "OUTSIDE NORMAL LIMITS" [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%