2015
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2014-1521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Priorities for Mental Health Interventions in War-Affected Youth: A Longitudinal Study

Abstract: BACKGROUND: War-affected youth often suffer from multiple co-occurring mental health problems.These youth often live in low-resource settings where it may be infeasible to provide mental health services that simultaneously address all of these co-occurring mental health issues. It is therefore important to identify the areas where targeted interventions would do the most good.METHODS: This analysis uses observational data from 3 waves of a longitudinal study on mental health in asampleof529 war-affectedyouth(2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With cohort data for which repeated measures of exposures are available, another approach might be to examine a single outcome at the end of follow up and fit a series of regressions, each of which controls for all exposures simultaneously in one wave but then also includes a single subsequent exposure – one per regression – from the next wave. 15,16 One might refer to this as a “confounder-lagged exposure-wide epidemiologic design.” See Betancourt et al 27 for a recent example in which both this and an outcome-wide approach were simultaneously used in the study of mental health outcome for war-affected youth. Other variations that attempt to straightforwardly automate the confounder selection process for exposure-wide epidemiologic studies containing numerous exposures might also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With cohort data for which repeated measures of exposures are available, another approach might be to examine a single outcome at the end of follow up and fit a series of regressions, each of which controls for all exposures simultaneously in one wave but then also includes a single subsequent exposure – one per regression – from the next wave. 15,16 One might refer to this as a “confounder-lagged exposure-wide epidemiologic design.” See Betancourt et al 27 for a recent example in which both this and an outcome-wide approach were simultaneously used in the study of mental health outcome for war-affected youth. Other variations that attempt to straightforwardly automate the confounder selection process for exposure-wide epidemiologic studies containing numerous exposures might also be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the outcome-wide approach could itself be employed across numerous exposures giving something of a hybrid between the outcomewide and exposure-wide approaches. See Betancourt et al (2015) for such an example in examining the effects, for former child soldiers in Sierra Leone, of schooling, community acceptance, stigma and other exposures on numerous subsequent outcomes.…”
Section: Lagged Exposure-wide Designsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same sample, losing a caregiver and multiple daily hardships were associated with being in the subgroup of individuals who experienced a worsening of internalizing symptoms over time. Family abuse and neglect postconflict and social disorder in the community were associated with membership in the subgroup who maintained elevated levels of internalizing problems (Betancourt, Gilman, Brennan, Zahn, & VanderWeele, Under Review; Betancourt, McBain, Newnham, & Brennan, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%