Identifying Priorities for the Protection of Deep Mediterranean Sea Ecosystems Through an Integrated Approach

Abstract

Benthic habitats of the deep Mediterranean Sea and the biodiversity they host are increasingly jeopardized by increasing human pressures, both direct and indirect, which encompass fisheries, chemical and acoustic pollution, littering, oil and gas exploration and production and marine infrastructures (i.e., cable and pipeline laying), and bioprospecting. To this, is added the pervasive and growing effects of human-induced perturbations of the climate system. International frameworks provide foundations for the protection of deep-sea ecosystems, but the lack of standardized criteria for the identification of areas deserving protection, insufficient legislative instruments and poor implementation hinder an efficient set up in practical terms. Here, we discuss the international legal frameworks and management measures in relation to the status of habitats and key species in the deep Mediterranean Basin. By comparing the results of a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and of expert evaluation (EE), we identify priority deep-sea areas for conservation and select five criteria for the designation of future protected areas in the deep Mediterranean Sea. Our results indicate that areas (1) with high ecological relevance (e.g., hosting endemic and locally endangered species and rare habitats),(2) ensuring shelf-slope connectivity (e.g., submarine canyons), and (3) subject to current and foreseeable intense anthropogenic impacts, should be prioritized for conservation. The results presented here provide an ecosystem-based conservation strategy for designating priority areas for protection in the deep Mediterranean Sea.

Transects in the deep: Opportunities with tele-operated resident seafloor robots

“…This will result in an even more severe loss of marine biodiversity and ecosystem services (Danovaro et al, 2008;Danovaro et al, 2017). To support conservation efforts for these ecosystems, it is important to adapt and integrate new monitoring guidelines, data acquisition protocols and cost-effective technologies (Gann et al, 2019;Aguzzi et al, 2020b;Fanelli et al, 2021). Intelligent (i.e., highly autonomous and robotic-sustained) monitoring, not only on a scientific and logistical level but also from the point of view of operational sustainability, is seen as increasing in necessity within the EU's Marine Strategy Framework Directive (Heiskanen et al, 2016) and the UN's Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (Ryabinin et al, 2019).…”

Identifying and prioritizing demersal fisheries restricted areas based on combined ecological and fisheries criteria: the western Mediterranean

“…The identification of MEVAs and PAMs is complementary to previous analysis in the region, which focused either on the analysis of EFHs "hotspots" (Scientific Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries, 2022a) or specific VMEs areas (Fanelli et al, 2021).…”

Análise de Decisão Multicritério como Subsídio a Determinação de Áreas de Aptidão para Alcance de Objetivos em Parques Nacionais

“…As ações e atividades geradoras de impacto se apresentam, na verdade, como critérios que podem ser manipulados, dimensionados e avaliados de forma individualizada ou coletiva, com o intuito de verificar a qualidade socioambiental dos ambientes ou a identificação de áreas prioritárias (Fanelli et al, 2021). Quando são realizados mapeamento e identificação de elementos como ameaças, características culturais e climáticas, fragmentação da vegetação, ou ainda a ausência de modelos de organização social, reunidos em um sistema de informação espacial, pode-se agrupar e estabelecer relações entre esses elementos (Saura et al, 2018;Pham et al, 2021;Fanelli et al, 2021). É possível determinar também quais elementos podem ter um peso maior ou menor para o alcance do objetivo.…”