2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2014.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying priority areas for national-level conservation to achieve Aichi Target 11: A case study of using terrestrial birds breeding in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…General application Examples Specific issues Examples Conservation Identification of priority areas for bird conservation Guisan et al 2013, Frick et al 2014 Seabirds and marine environments Lavers et al 2014 Identifying protected areas to meet specific targets Naoe et al 2015 Identifying no-go areas to reduce human-wildlife conflicts in wind power planning Reid et al 2015 Identifying specific habitats for certain species needs Brambilla and Saporetti 2014 Validating umbrella species to match conservation goals Fourcade et al 2017 Evaluating or forecasting the effect of environmental changes Green et al 2008 Future effectiveness of protected areas over different spatial scales Coetzee et al 2009, Hole et al 2009, Veloz et al 2013, Virkkala et al 2013, Brambilla et al 2015 Kissling 2013, Tracewski et al 2016 Including changes in demography Haché et al 2016 Including nest predation and food limitation Harris et al 2012 Including wind farm construction Bastos et al 2016 Invasive birds Predictions of invasion risk Muñoz and Real 2006, Nyári et al 2006, Real et al 2008, Strubbe and Matthysen 2009, Herrando et al 2010, Di Febbraro and Mori 2015, Fraser et al 2015 Range dynamics under climate change Huntley et al 2007, Reino et al 2009, Graham et al 2011 (Continued) …”
Section: Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…General application Examples Specific issues Examples Conservation Identification of priority areas for bird conservation Guisan et al 2013, Frick et al 2014 Seabirds and marine environments Lavers et al 2014 Identifying protected areas to meet specific targets Naoe et al 2015 Identifying no-go areas to reduce human-wildlife conflicts in wind power planning Reid et al 2015 Identifying specific habitats for certain species needs Brambilla and Saporetti 2014 Validating umbrella species to match conservation goals Fourcade et al 2017 Evaluating or forecasting the effect of environmental changes Green et al 2008 Future effectiveness of protected areas over different spatial scales Coetzee et al 2009, Hole et al 2009, Veloz et al 2013, Virkkala et al 2013, Brambilla et al 2015 Kissling 2013, Tracewski et al 2016 Including changes in demography Haché et al 2016 Including nest predation and food limitation Harris et al 2012 Including wind farm construction Bastos et al 2016 Invasive birds Predictions of invasion risk Muñoz and Real 2006, Nyári et al 2006, Real et al 2008, Strubbe and Matthysen 2009, Herrando et al 2010, Di Febbraro and Mori 2015, Fraser et al 2015 Range dynamics under climate change Huntley et al 2007, Reino et al 2009, Graham et al 2011 (Continued) …”
Section: Topicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In steep montane landscapes, where forested ecosystems are often preserved (e.g. Naoe et al 2015), elevational distances can be sufficiently large to cause differences in annual temperature between stands, even those separated by small horizontal distances. Thus, temporal patterns of masting might change along elevational gradients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, MaxEnt has been widely applied to quantify the relationship between species distribution and environmental factors and to predict the potential distribution of species [19]. The model can also be used to evaluate habitat suitability for species, such as in some waterfowl habitat evaluation [13,20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%