2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69863-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying priority habitat for conservation and management of Australian humpback dolphins within a marine protected area

Abstract: spatial distribution of humpback dolphins among seasons (see Supplementary Appendix S3 for further details on seasonal analysis), and thus we conducted further analysis on the pooled dataset.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
6
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Predictor variables used in this study were selected because they are known or have been suggested to affect the presence of bottlenose dolphins or their prey, with some variables acting as proxies for prey distribution (i.e., SST), predation risk (i.e., water visibility), and areas of high human use and anthropogenic disturbance (i.e., distance to boat ramp and marine park zone) (Heithaus and Dill, 2002;Ingram and Rogan, 2002;Zanardo et al, 2017;Sprogis et al, 2018a). Proxies for areas of high human use and therefore, anthropogenic disturbance included distance to boat ramp and marine park zone (Passadore et al, 2018;Hunt et al, 2020). Marine park zones have varying levels of restrictions (see section "Study Site") and commercial and recreational boat users frequently launch from boat ramps (personal observations) so it was inferred that these sites indicated various levels of anthropogenic pressure.…”
Section: Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Predictor variables used in this study were selected because they are known or have been suggested to affect the presence of bottlenose dolphins or their prey, with some variables acting as proxies for prey distribution (i.e., SST), predation risk (i.e., water visibility), and areas of high human use and anthropogenic disturbance (i.e., distance to boat ramp and marine park zone) (Heithaus and Dill, 2002;Ingram and Rogan, 2002;Zanardo et al, 2017;Sprogis et al, 2018a). Proxies for areas of high human use and therefore, anthropogenic disturbance included distance to boat ramp and marine park zone (Passadore et al, 2018;Hunt et al, 2020). Marine park zones have varying levels of restrictions (see section "Study Site") and commercial and recreational boat users frequently launch from boat ramps (personal observations) so it was inferred that these sites indicated various levels of anthropogenic pressure.…”
Section: Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without the inclusion of adequate spatial and biological information, habitats can be under-protected, compromising the conservation and management of important marine species and ecosystems (Davidson et al, 2012;Gregr et al, 2013;Guisan et al, 2013;Hartel et al, 2015). Thus, information on the spatial distribution of marine mammals and the physical and biological environmental factors influencing such distribution is essential to inform and evaluate conservation and management decisions and future environmental impacts (Zanardo et al, 2017;Passadore et al, 2018;Hunt et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The immigration and emigration rates are not purely biological parameters but can be controlled by the configuration of PAs [32]. Protecting favored sites by a target species is desirable to increase conservation benefit in PAs [16]. However, when MPAs are used for a sustainable fisheries management tool, a moderate spillover effect is necessary to promote fishing yields [22,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%