2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying profiles of recovery from reward devaluation in rats

Abstract: In humans and other mammals, the unexpected loss of a resource can lead to emotional conflict. Consummatory successive negative contrast (cSNC) is a laboratory model of reward devaluation meant to capture that conflict. In this paradigm, animals are exposed to a sharp reduction in the sucrose concentration of a solution after several days of access. This downshift in sucrose content leads to behavioral responses such as the suppression of consumption and physiologic responses including elevation of corticoster… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this hypothesis has been supported by behavioral, pharmacological, hormonal, and neuroanatomical evidence , only a few studies have systematically explored the genetic basis of individual differences in psychological pain (Torres and Sabariego, 2014). There are well-defined individual differences in recovery from reward devaluation (S. Papini et al, 2014) that respond to selective breeding (Flaherty et al, 1994;Ortega et al, 2014c). But the bulk of information comes from established strains.…”
Section: Acc and Psychological Painmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although this hypothesis has been supported by behavioral, pharmacological, hormonal, and neuroanatomical evidence , only a few studies have systematically explored the genetic basis of individual differences in psychological pain (Torres and Sabariego, 2014). There are well-defined individual differences in recovery from reward devaluation (S. Papini et al, 2014) that respond to selective breeding (Flaherty et al, 1994;Ortega et al, 2014c). But the bulk of information comes from established strains.…”
Section: Acc and Psychological Painmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, there was no evidence that prior downshift or ethanol experience had a measurable effect on the size of the cSNC effects observed in these experiments. There are individual differences in the extent to which rats respond to the downshift event in the cSNC situation [ 27 , 28 ] that are responsible for variability across experiments. What seems clear is that variations in the strength of the cSNC effects reported in these experiments did not prevent hypoalgesia from developing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otros estudios han puesto de manifiesto la existencia de diferencias individuales en la sensibilidad al dolor físico y psicológico, así como en la respuesta a su manipulación farmacológica. El análisis de una muestra extensa indica que, aunque la mayoría de los animales se recuperan rápidamente de una devaluación del 324% de sacarosa, el 11% no muestra signos de recuperación (Papini et al, 2014). Esta diferenciación de perfiles de recuperación se utilizó también en un estudio de selección artificial.…”
Section: El Contraste Sucesivo Negativo Como Modelo Animal De Frustraciónunclassified