Identifying race and ethnicity in the 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth

Abstract

The 1979 National Longitudinal Survey of Youth is among the few surveys to provide multiple reports on respondents’ race and ethnicity. Respondents were initially classified as Hispanic, black, or “other” on the basis of data collected during 1978 screener interviews. Respondents subsequently self-reported their “origin or descent” in 1979, and their race and Hispanic origin in 2002; the latter questions conform to the federal standards adopted in 1997 and used in the 2000 census. We use these data to (a) assess the size and nature of the multiracial population, (b) measure the degree of consistency among these alternative race-related variables, and (c) devise a number of alternative race/ethnicity taxonomies and determine which does the best job of explaining variation in log-wages. A key finding is that the explanatory power of race and ethnicity variables improves considerably when we cross-classify respondents by race and Hispanic origin. Little information is lost when multiracial respondents are assigned to one of their reported race categories because they make up only 1.3% of the sample. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007Race, Ethnicity, Multiracial, Population,

The Intergenerational Transmission of Discrimination: Children’s Experiences of Unfair Treatment and Their Mothers’ Health at Midlife

“…To determine the race of the NLSY79 respondent, we relied on an indicator based on the interviewer's initial assessment in 1979. Subsequent analyses revealed a high correlation between the interviewer's and respondent's racial identification in the NLSY79 (Light and Nandi 2007). We divided the sample into three mutually exclusive racial categories-non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Hispanics.…”

Association of Incarceration With Mortality by Race From a National Longitudinal Cohort Study

“…This race and ethnicity variable relied partly on interviewer-perceived race in addition to participant self-identification and did not allow for reliable differentiation between non-Hispanic White and other non-Hispanic non-Black groups (eg, Asian, Native American) (see eMethods 2 and eTables 1 and 2 in the Supplement for details on our approach to the available race and ethnicity data). 21 , 22 …”

Overlap Between Industrial Niching and Workplace Segregation: Role of Immigration Policy, Culture and Country of Origin

“…The social networks of migrant women tend to be more neighbourhood-based and their social networks include more co-ethnics. Hence, living in segregated neighbourhoods tends to contribute more to female niching and workplace segregation compared to men (Light & Nandi, 2007;Tammaru et al, 2016).…”