2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2021.100883
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying risk patterns in older adults with atrial fibrillation by hierarchical cluster analysis: A retrospective approach based on the risk probability for clinical events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis yielded three patient clusters, each with distinct characteristics and cost trajectories: CV with rather high costs, SM with similarly high costs and IS with substantially lower costs. Some attempts to cluster the heterogeneity of patients with AF were reported previously, but not linked with cost trajectories 12 26–28. To facilitate an understanding of observed trajectories, we based our analysis on patient baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis yielded three patient clusters, each with distinct characteristics and cost trajectories: CV with rather high costs, SM with similarly high costs and IS with substantially lower costs. Some attempts to cluster the heterogeneity of patients with AF were reported previously, but not linked with cost trajectories 12 26–28. To facilitate an understanding of observed trajectories, we based our analysis on patient baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prospective cohort study patients we report on differ from the patient populations underlying recent AF cost studies in four ways, with implications for the interpretation of the results. First, most studies to date relied on administrative databases only21 25 29; second, they were often retrospective19 21 25 27; and third, they had short follow-up times between 0.5 and 3 years 19 24. By combining clinical and health insurance claims data prospectively, we add information on the longer-term healthcare costs of patients with AF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attempts to cluster the heterogeneity of AF patients were reported previously, but not linked with cost trajectories. 12,[26][27][28] To facilitate an understanding of expected patient trajectories, we based our analysis on baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,26 The prospective cohort study patients we report on differ from the patient populations underlying recent AF costs studies in four ways, which has implication for the interpretation of the results. Firstly, most studies to-date relied on administrative databases 21,25,30 ; secondly, they were often retrospective 19,21,25,27 ; and thirdly, had short follow-up times between 0.5 to 3 years 19,24,29 . In combining clinical and health insurance claims data prospectively, the present analysis adds detailed insight into the longer-term healthcare costs of AF patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several cluster analyses have reportedly identified up to seven clinical phenotypes in patients with AF, with many of these analyses indicating that rates of mortality or major adverse cardiovascular or neurological events (MACNE) could be stratified by cluster [11][12][13][14][15][16]. For example, in an analysis of patients enrolled in the ORBIT-AF Registry, the incidence rates of MACNE were 2.58%, 3.97%, 5.10%, and 6.12% per year for clusters defined by low comorbidity rates, younger age or comorbid behavioral disorders, device implantation, or atherosclerotic comorbidities, respectively [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%