2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10212-018-0399-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying science students at risk in the first year of higher education: the incremental value of non-cognitive variables in predicting early academic achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
17
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim of the current study was 2-fold: (1) to identify student profiles that include cognitive, metacognitive and motivational aspects of learning, as well as aspects of mental healthresilience, emotion dysregulation anxiety, and procrastination, and (2) to investigate whether or not students with different profiles also differ regarding GPA and success rate in their first year of study. Although current research on students' profiles has identified profiles based on cognitive, metacognitive and motivational aspects of learning, aspects of mental health and well-being have been largely neglected so far (Willems et al, 2018) despite playing a crucial role in students' transition from secondary to higher education and having an impact on students' achievement (Schaeper, 2019). Therefore, the current study focuses on determining (meta)cognitiveemotional learner profiles in first-year students in higher education and how these different profiles differ with regard to academic achievement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The aim of the current study was 2-fold: (1) to identify student profiles that include cognitive, metacognitive and motivational aspects of learning, as well as aspects of mental healthresilience, emotion dysregulation anxiety, and procrastination, and (2) to investigate whether or not students with different profiles also differ regarding GPA and success rate in their first year of study. Although current research on students' profiles has identified profiles based on cognitive, metacognitive and motivational aspects of learning, aspects of mental health and well-being have been largely neglected so far (Willems et al, 2018) despite playing a crucial role in students' transition from secondary to higher education and having an impact on students' achievement (Schaeper, 2019). Therefore, the current study focuses on determining (meta)cognitiveemotional learner profiles in first-year students in higher education and how these different profiles differ with regard to academic achievement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this line of thinking, the first year of studies in university appears to play an important role in students' future academic achievement and well-being, and consequently in their future professional success and their personal development (Leese, 2010;Trautwein and Bosse, 2017). Even though the predictive power of cognitive factors has been extensively studied, the investigation of a combination of non-cognitive factors such as self-regulation, motivation, and anxiety (Fonteyne et al, 2017;Willems et al, 2018) along with mental health and personality variables (Schneider and Preckel, 2017;Schaeper, 2019) should also be included as they seem to influence this crucial period in students' life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A distinction must therefore be made between different types of academic motivation. Thus, we distinguish between autonomous motivation, which involves the study of a personal interest (intrinsic regulation), and controlled motivation, which involves the existence of external sources of motivation (external regulation) or a desire to rise to the expectations of others (introjected regulation) (Tang et al, 2018;Willems et al, 2019).…”
Section: Academic Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After analyzing the literature on the use of this terminology in different subject fields, York et al identified six elements which define it namely: academic achievement; engagement in educationally purposeful activities; satisfaction; acquisition of desired knowledge, skills and competencies; persistence; attainment of educational outcomes, and post-college performance (p. 5). Furthermore, Education Data Mining (EDM) has been used for predicting a variety of crucial educational outcomes such as performance, success, satisfaction, and achievement (Calvet Llinan and Juan Perez, 2015;Dutt et al 2017;Anoopkumar and Rahman, 2016;Martins et al 2019;Willems et al 2019). Despite all these publications, it is still difficult for faculty to effectively apply known techniques to specific academic problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%