2015
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.60.6129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Social Distress: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Social Outcomes 12 to 36 Months After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis

Abstract: Purpose To establish the prevalence and determinants of poor social outcomes after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods All 12- to 36-month survivors of CRC (International Classification of Diseases [10th revision] codes C18 to C20) diagnosed in 2010 or 2011 and treated in the English National Health Service were identified and sent a questionnaire from their treating cancer hospital. This included the Social Difficulties Inventory, a 16-item scale of social distress (SD) comprising eve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 Survivors with permanent ostomies are also more likely to experience social distress post-treatment. 29 Similar to other studies 4,5 , we found a high prevalence of persistent sexual dysfunction associated symptoms in both female and male survivors regardless of ostomy status. This suggests that problems with the physiologic functionality that impact sexual function are universal for all RC survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…27,28 Survivors with permanent ostomies are also more likely to experience social distress post-treatment. 29 Similar to other studies 4,5 , we found a high prevalence of persistent sexual dysfunction associated symptoms in both female and male survivors regardless of ostomy status. This suggests that problems with the physiologic functionality that impact sexual function are universal for all RC survivors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…12.6)Range—not specified100% F≤8 months post-diagnosis++ Wright 2005 [65]-Data pulled from 3 studies: -Study 1 (psychometric evaluation of Social Difficulties Inventory (SDI), including test-retest) -Study 2 (cross-sectional, single time-point survey) -Study 3 (longitudinal survey, assessments at baseline, 6-, 12- and 24-month examining the relationship between social difficulties and psychological distress with deprivation)Multiple609 = (270 + 189 + 150)Inclusion—not specifiedMean—not specifiedRange—not specified, grouped as ≤40, 41–60 and ≥6150% F50% MA range across the 3 studies (N.B. <3 months in study 3)+++ Wright 2015 [66]-Single time-point survey-Examining social difficulties, impact on social aspects of life including home and work, finances and relationships and recreationColorectal21,802SDI-16—17,830/21,802SDI-21—16,962/21,802Inclusion—>16Mean—not specifiedRange—not specified, grouped as <55, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84 and ≥85All respondents 41.8% F 58.2% MSD-16 39.9% F 60.1% M12–36 months post-diagnosis+++ s.d. standard deviation…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marked against the quality criteria in Box 2, and reported in Table 1, only four studies scored highly (+++) [47, 57, 65, 66]. Some individual criteria warrant specific comment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A cross-sectional survey using this instrument was conducted through the English National Health Service of 12-36 month colorectal cancer survivors with 21 802 participants. A total of 15.1% reported experiencing social difficulties [41].…”
Section: Additional Validated Patient-reported Outcomes Instruments Fmentioning
confidence: 99%