Identifying solutions to increase participation in physical activity interventions within a socio-economically disadvantaged community: a qualitative study

Abstract

BackgroundThere is an urgent need to increase population levels of physical activity, particularly amongst those who are socio-economically disadvantaged. Multiple factors influence physical activity behaviour but the generalisability of current evidence to such ‘hard-to-reach’ population subgroups is limited by difficulties in recruiting them into studies. Also, rigorous qualitative studies of lay perceptions and perceptions of community leaders about public health efforts to increase physical activity are sparse. We sought to explore, within a socio-economically disadvantaged community, residents’ and community leaders’ perceptions of physical activity (PA) interventions and issues regarding their implementation, in order to improve understanding of needs, expectations, and social/environmental factors relevant to future interventions.MethodsWithin an ongoing regeneration project (Connswater Community Greenway), in a socio-economically disadvantaged community in Belfast, we collaborated with a Community Development Agency to purposively sample leaders from public- and voluntary-sector community groups and residents. Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 leaders. Residents (n = 113), of both genders and a range of ages (14 to 86 years) participated in focus groups (n = 14) in local facilities. Interviews and focus groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic framework.ResultsThree main themes were identified: awareness of PA interventions; factors contributing to intervention effectiveness; and barriers to participation in PA interventions. Participants reported awareness only of interventions in which they were involved directly, highlighting a need for better communications, both inter- and intra-sectoral, and with residents. Meaningful engagement of residents in planning/organisation, tailoring to local context, supporting volunteers, providing relevant resources and an ‘exit strategy’ were perceived as important factors related to intervention effectiveness. Negative attitudes such as apathy, disappointing experiences, information with no perceived personal relevance and limited access to facilities were barriers to people participating in interventions.ConclusionsThese findings illustrate the complexity of influences on a community’s participation in PA interventions and support a social-ecological approach to promoting PA. They highlight the need for cross-sector working, effective information exchange, involving residents in bottom-up planning and providing adequate financial and social support. An in-depth understanding of a target population’s perspectives is of key importance in translating PA behaviour change theories into practice.

Promoting physical activity interventions in communities with poor health and socio-economic profiles: A process evaluation of the implementation of a new walking group scheme

“…This is despite evidence that an in-depth understanding of a target group's perspective and involvement in ‘bottom-up’ planning is important in disadvantaged communities (Cleland et al., 2014). Additionally, active recruitment methods (those initiated by the programme) rather than passive (potential participant makes the first contact with the programme), such as ‘word of mouth’ are most effective in engaging hard to reach groups (Matthews et al., 2012).…”

Was Glasgow 2014 inspirational? Exploring the legacy impacts of a mega-sport event via the theorized demonstration and festival effects

“…Through the current study a recommendation for future mega-events would be the implementation of complementary physical activity and sports interventions alongside the main sporting event Cleland et al 2014). It is thought that this would have the potential for positive impact on the community.…”

Community perceptions of the implementation and impact of an intervention to improve the neighbourhood physical environment to promote walking for transport: a qualitative study

“…Many of the barriers and facilitators for implementation identified by community members in this study concur with previous research findings reported by intervention developers and deliverers in other walking, physical activity or health interventions. Specifically, in relation to: the challenges of engaging community members [ 17 ]; the importance of consulting stakeholders, including meaningful community involvement [ 28 , 36 ]; the important role of word of mouth in recruiting participants for community-based walking interventions, particularly in ‘hard to reach’ groups [ 37 , 38 ]; and the need for collaborative partnerships and ongoing support from stakeholders when using community engagement approaches [ 28 , 39 ]. The critical role of trained facilitators (coordinators) with specific skills and attributes to help deliver the intervention noted in this study has also been highlighted elsewhere [ 39 ].…”