2015
DOI: 10.1179/0093469014z.000000000108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying stone tools used in mining, smelting, and casting in Middle Bronze Age Cyprus

Abstract: Metallurgical production sites are often difficult to identify in the archaeological record because ore beneficiation and slag processing in the past involved the use of ground stone tools that were similar to those used in other contexts to prepare cereals and foods. Analysis of the ground stone assemblage from a Middle Bronze Age copper mining and production site at Ambelikou Aletri in Cyprus provided an opportunity to distinguish industrial and domestic ground stone tools and to identify the types of tools … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the exact organization, techniques, processes, and equipment employed in bronze metallurgy still have to be identified within these cultures (Pernot 1998). In fact, these workshops generally left only ephemeral archeological traces, such as hearths, rare crucible fragments, or various kinds of stone tools (Armbruster 2010;Boutoille 2015;Freudenberg 2010;Webb 2015). Consequently, the reliable identification of metallurgists' stone tools on different types of archeological sites (open-air settlements, specialized workshops, enclosures) appears to be a promising and challenging new approach to identifying the practice of bronze metallurgy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the exact organization, techniques, processes, and equipment employed in bronze metallurgy still have to be identified within these cultures (Pernot 1998). In fact, these workshops generally left only ephemeral archeological traces, such as hearths, rare crucible fragments, or various kinds of stone tools (Armbruster 2010;Boutoille 2015;Freudenberg 2010;Webb 2015). Consequently, the reliable identification of metallurgists' stone tools on different types of archeological sites (open-air settlements, specialized workshops, enclosures) appears to be a promising and challenging new approach to identifying the practice of bronze metallurgy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, determining their function is difficult since the Iron Age copper smelting process is not fully understood, and ethnographic parallels for pre-industrial copper production are rare. The few studies which focused on ground stone tools at copper production sites (e.g., Vardi et al 2008;Rosenberg & Golani 2012;Webb 2015) deal with different periods and production scales, and thus have limited value for the study of the Timna ground stone assemblage. As opposed to the clear industrial context at Timna, these other studies were preoccupied with distinguishing between industrial and domestic ground stone tools (except Vardi et al 2008, to some degree).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cases primarily include ground stone tools, mostly hammerstones and grinding stones, which have been systematically described in a set of papers [e.g. [24,[42][43][44][45][46][47]. However, some feature knapped flint, either as implements in fire-ignition equipment (e.g., the eighth-seventeenth-century AD Indonesian iron production sites; [26]) or as retouched tools and debitage that were probably used for cutting and scraping.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%