2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-020-01017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the bone-breaker at the Navalmaíllo Rock Shelter (Pinilla del Valle, Madrid) using machine learning algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From a similar perspective, techniques in remote sensing, photogrammetry and microscopy also provide distinct advantages for the collection of different types of data, supported in many cases by the use of high resolution metric data 37,[58][59][60] . Likewise, the use of computational learning has also proven a useful diagnostic tool for the analysis of fracture plane patterns 61 , obtaining high classification rates when applied to archaeological samples as well 62 . From another perspective, computer vision applications can also be considered an interesting development in the field of taphonomy 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a similar perspective, techniques in remote sensing, photogrammetry and microscopy also provide distinct advantages for the collection of different types of data, supported in many cases by the use of high resolution metric data 37,[58][59][60] . Likewise, the use of computational learning has also proven a useful diagnostic tool for the analysis of fracture plane patterns 61 , obtaining high classification rates when applied to archaeological samples as well 62 . From another perspective, computer vision applications can also be considered an interesting development in the field of taphonomy 63 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies demonstrated that the kinds of prey and their ages (e.g., Stiner 1990;Bunn and Pickering 2010), skeletal part representation and fragmentation (e.g., Blumenschine 1986Blumenschine 1988Marean and Spencer 1991;Marean et al 1992), and the types of bone surface modifications, their locations, and frequencies (e.g., Blumenschine 1986Blumenschine 1988Capaldo 1997;Domínguez-Rodrigo 1999) provide reliable insights into the agent(s) responsible for the accumulation of fossil bone assemblages. In addition to these more traditional methods, researchers are now employing a variety of sophisticated high-resolution imaging (e.g., Pante et al 2017;Courtenay et al 2019), multivariate analyses (e.g., Domínguez-Rodrigo and Yravedra 2009;Domínguez-Rodrigo and Pickering 2010), and machine learning (e.g., Harris et al 2017;Domínguez-Rodrigo 2019;Moclán et al 2020) techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incorporation of digital imaging and data extraction opens opportunities for using powerful computational tools such as machine learning which has been employed in bone modification studies (Arriaza, Aramendi, Maté-González, Yravedra, & Stratford, 2021;Byeon et al, 2019;Cifuentes-Alcobendas & Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2019;Courtenay et al, 2020;Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2019;Domínguez-Rodrigo & Baquedano, 2018;Domínguez-Rodrigo, Fernández-Jaúregui, Cifuentes-Alcobendas, & Baquedano, 2021;Domínguez-Rodrigo, Wonmin, et al, 2017;Jiménez-García, Abellán, Baquedano, Cifuentes-Alcobendas, & Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2020;Jiménez-García, Aznarte, Abellán, Baquedano, & Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2020;Moclán, Domínguez-Rodrigo, & Yravedra, 2019;Moclán et al, 2020;Pizarro-Monzo & Domínguez-Rodrigo, 2020). However, most of these papers have focused on the use of machine learning for discriminating bone surface modifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%