2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the evolutionary process of emerging technologies: A chronological network analysis of World Wide Web conference sessions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…betweenness centrality) clusters (e.g. Furukawa et al, 2015;Shibata et al, 2011), that form around documents that are highly cited by recent documents and the citations of which also are mostly from recent documents (Breitzman and Thomas, 2015), or that cite more recent clusters as identified by the (Salton) similarity of their references (Morris et al, 2003). Small et al (2014) have recently proposed a hybrid approach based on a combination of direct citation and co-citation models as applied to publication data.…”
Section: Radical Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…betweenness centrality) clusters (e.g. Furukawa et al, 2015;Shibata et al, 2011), that form around documents that are highly cited by recent documents and the citations of which also are mostly from recent documents (Breitzman and Thomas, 2015), or that cite more recent clusters as identified by the (Salton) similarity of their references (Morris et al, 2003). Small et al (2014) have recently proposed a hybrid approach based on a combination of direct citation and co-citation models as applied to publication data.…”
Section: Radical Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a few decades, the technology roadmapping approaches have become widely used by government, researchers, and industrialists in many different business and technology areas, particularly for large technology-intensive firms in the aerospace and defence sector (Farrukh et al, 2009;Vishnevskiy et al, 2015), consumer electronics sector (Huang et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015;Lischka and Gemunden, 2008), and energy sector (Daim and Oliver, 2008;Dixon et al, 2014;Hooshangi et al, 2013;Shibata et al, 2010;Vishnevskiy et al, 2015), and is spreading to many other areas (Amadi-Echendu et al, 2011;Carvalho et al, 2013;Cheng et al, 2014;Gerdsri et al, 2009;Geum et al, 2015;Kerr et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2015b;Phaal et al, 2010;Saritas and Aylen, 2010). Moreover, some researchers have provided insight into roadmapping disruptive technologies (Amer and Daim, 2010;Carvalho et al, 2013;Daim and Oliver, 2008;Dixon et al, 2014;Furukawa et al, 2015;Kostoff et al, 2004) and assessing emerging technologies (Amer and Daim, 2010;Daim and Oliver, 2008;Furukawa et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2014;Li et al, 2015;Linton, 2004;Phaal et al, 2011;Yasunaga et al, 2009). …”
Section: Technology Roadmappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researches focused on bibliometric inputs related with usage y application of the document classification in business and companies [9][10][11][12][13], the learning engine with unbalanced data [14], knowledge management [15][16][17][18][19], Algorithms theory and computational methodologies [20][21][22][23][24][25], computational electronic services [26][27][28], digital information management and context management for smart environments [29][30][31][32][33][34], quality based research and e-assessment [35][36][37][38][39][40], e-business and interpretation techniques [16,[41][42][43][44][45] to identify new concepts, theories, methods and techniques that allow its effective application on hybrid and technological emergent environments [18,[46][47][48][49][50] Nonetheless, there are few researches that allow to obtain or to build a state of the art of particular subject in semiautomatic manner within a time frame. The...…”
Section: Review Of Previous Researchesmentioning
confidence: 99%