2018
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the favored mutation in a positive selective sweep

Abstract: Methods to identify signatures of selective sweeps in population genomics data have been actively developed, but mostly do not identify the specific mutation favored by selection. We present a method, iSAFE, that uses a statistic derived solely from population genetics signals to accurately pinpoint the favored mutation in a large region (~5 Mbp). iSAFE does not require any knowledge of demography, specific phenotype under selection, or functional annotations of mutations.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
5
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual simulations were converted into two-dimensional matrices, or feature vector images, built from 89 rows corresponding to different summary statistics, and 11 columns corresponding to adjacent sub-windows. The 89 statistics include 17 that are implemented in diploS/HIC along with 72 derivatives of the recently developed SNP-specific SAFE statistic [32]. We defined the four completed hard/soft and partial hard/soft selective sweep states as containing a sweep within the central, focal sub-window.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual simulations were converted into two-dimensional matrices, or feature vector images, built from 89 rows corresponding to different summary statistics, and 11 columns corresponding to adjacent sub-windows. The 89 statistics include 17 that are implemented in diploS/HIC along with 72 derivatives of the recently developed SNP-specific SAFE statistic [32]. We defined the four completed hard/soft and partial hard/soft selective sweep states as containing a sweep within the central, focal sub-window.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…those with q < 0.01 in at least one population) compared to genes lacking known GWAS associations (Table S5; see Material and Methods). While such patterns may also be influenced by demographic structure, the availability of large numbers of high-coverage ancient human genomes in the next decade will make it possible to improve the resolution of candidate sweeps, potentially to the level of causal mutations (Akbari et al, 2018). In addition, information about the temporal relatedness of past genetic changes could help identify key interacting genes or networks, guiding research efforts investigating target loci.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, we expect inferences deriving from SS-H12 analysis to assist in formulating and guiding more informed questions about discovered candidates across diverse organisms for which sequence data-phased and unphased-exist. After establishing the timing and softness of a shared sweep, appropriate follow-up analyses can include inferring the age of a sweep [Smith et al, 2018], identifying the favored allele or alleles [Akbari et al, 2018], or identifying other populations connected to the shared sweep. We believe that our approach will serve to enhance investigations into a diverse variety of study systems, and facilitate the emergence of new perspectives and paradigms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%