2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the important outcomes to measure for pharmacy-led, clinical services within primary care: A nominal group technique approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, a final list of three ranked ideas were agreed upon in each workshop. There are no agreed-upon levels of acceptable consensus for NGTs, and pragmatically, a consensus level of two-thirds (or 66%) was considered appropriate [16,17].…”
Section: Data Analysis (Ngt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a final list of three ranked ideas were agreed upon in each workshop. There are no agreed-upon levels of acceptable consensus for NGTs, and pragmatically, a consensus level of two-thirds (or 66%) was considered appropriate [16,17].…”
Section: Data Analysis (Ngt)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pharmacy services in general practice are more defined and widespread in Scotland, where most practices had some access to the government‐funded Pharmacotherapy Service by June 2022 11 . In Scotland, general practice clinical pharmacists deliver advanced and specialist services (comprehensive medication reviews, high‐risk medication monitoring, specialist clinics), while core tasks (including prescription management, medication recalls, compliance reviews) are mainly delivered by pharmacy technicians and support workers 12,13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 In Scotland, general practice clinical pharmacists deliver advanced and specialist services (comprehensive medication reviews, high-risk medication monitoring, specialist clinics), while core tasks (including prescription management, medication recalls, compliance reviews) are mainly delivered by pharmacy technicians and support workers. 12,13 General practice pharmacists in Australia are acceptable to relevant stakeholders, 14,15 recommended by the Consumers Health Forum of Australia, 16 and have demonstrated benefits to patients. [17][18][19] However, a relative lack of consistent clinical outcome data, some resistance within the pharmacy profession, and a lack of sustainable funding are among the key issues that have hindered widespread implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%