2004
DOI: 10.2307/20159028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the Ingroup: A Closer Look at the Influence of Demographic Dissimilarity on Employee Social Identity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
4
120
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The few scholars who have considered gender either found no differences in MJH experiences (Jamal et al, 1998) or found the experience to be worse for women such that male teachers earned more “outside employment pay” than female teachers (Betts, 2004), and MJH mothers were more likely to experience depression and less life satisfaction than SJH mothers (Bruns & Pilkauskas, 2019). Looking across studies, it appears that MJHers with higher social-status indicators (e.g., more experience, male; Chattopadhyay, Tluchowska, & George, 2004) have more enriching outcomes.…”
Section: A Systematic Review Of the Mjh Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The few scholars who have considered gender either found no differences in MJH experiences (Jamal et al, 1998) or found the experience to be worse for women such that male teachers earned more “outside employment pay” than female teachers (Betts, 2004), and MJH mothers were more likely to experience depression and less life satisfaction than SJH mothers (Bruns & Pilkauskas, 2019). Looking across studies, it appears that MJHers with higher social-status indicators (e.g., more experience, male; Chattopadhyay, Tluchowska, & George, 2004) have more enriching outcomes.…”
Section: A Systematic Review Of the Mjh Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that implicit culture beliefs set up negative intercultural contact experiences, these beliefs could also have important implications for the study of diversity in organizational contexts. For example, research on work group diversity usually examines diversity based on objective criteria, such as differences in demographic characteristics (Chattopadhyay, Tluchowska, & George, 2004) or professional dissimilarity (Chattopadhyay, Finn, & Ashkanasy, 2010). The subjective experience of diversity shaped by implicit culture beliefs might interplay with objective dissimilarities to exert unique influence on organizational outcome.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, a large proportion of whites in the workplace does not cause status contamination or loss of social status for racial/ethnic minorities. As the status construction theory suggests, racial/ethnic minorities in a whitedominant society may even prefer being associated with whites (Chattopadhyay et al, 2004;Fiske, 2002). White employees in a white-majority workplace would enjoy better social integration within their large in-group without receiving strong out-group disparagement from minority groups to counteract the benefit.…”
Section: Racial/ethnic Similarity and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%