2014
DOI: 10.4067/s0717-92002014000200004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the main actors and their positions on international forest policy issues in Argentina

Abstract: SUMMARYSince the Earth Summit in Rio in 1992, forest management and conservation have become important issues in international forestrelated politics and policies. As a result, different international initiatives have dealt with the subject directly or indirectly, building up a fragmented international forest regime complex made of international laws and agreements about forests. The diverse elements of this regime complex are differently made relevant by various actors in different countries. The aim of this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These issues are also observed work in Bangladesh (Rahman & Giessen, 2014) and Argentina (Burns & Giessen, 2014), and strengthen a notion mentioning recent global initiatives on forest spin around issue of forest sustainability, legal timber and REDD+ (McDermott, 2012). Two issues that are more technical as well as potentially contentious, specifically harmonization of wood and forest certification schemes and land use change were not present in public deliberations, but rather remained limited to expert circles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…These issues are also observed work in Bangladesh (Rahman & Giessen, 2014) and Argentina (Burns & Giessen, 2014), and strengthen a notion mentioning recent global initiatives on forest spin around issue of forest sustainability, legal timber and REDD+ (McDermott, 2012). Two issues that are more technical as well as potentially contentious, specifically harmonization of wood and forest certification schemes and land use change were not present in public deliberations, but rather remained limited to expert circles.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…This selection occurs differently in different countries (Wibowo and Giessen 2012;Burns and Giessen 2014), leading us to the conclusion that the specific national public media debate, issues, and policies shape the perception of the IFR-C in each country. This diversity of domestic views on the IFR-C, which, itself, promotes a homogeneous view, leads to vertical fragmentation in terms of diverse actors, interests, institutions, and constituencies (Biermann et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often based on actors' interests, positions are defined as the publically stated preferences toward specific policies (Burns and Giessen 2014;Wibowo and Giessen 2012). Political actors can make active use of public media, expressing their positions in order to gain support for their interests (Kleinschmit and Krott 2008).…”
Section: R a F Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, experts had highlighted this issue as being of current importance in both national and international forest policy affairs, making this a widely discussed key issue in international forest regime literature (e.g., [1,3,7,45]). Singer [46] shows the interaction of international forest regime and national forest-related policies.…”
Section: Sfm Policy: Global and Domestic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A globally discussed SFM issue (consisting of national and international SFM policies) was selected, which had already been identified elsewhere as an important international forest-related issue in Bangladesh [44]. Additionally, experts had highlighted this issue as being of current importance in both national and international forest policy affairs, making this a widely discussed key issue in international forest regime literature (e.g., [1,3,7,45]). Singer [46] shows the interaction of international forest regime and national forest-related policies.…”
Section: Sfm Policy: Global and Domestic Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%