Identifying the Potential of Zero Charge and Faradaic Reactions By Step Potential Electrochemical Spectroscopy

Abstract

The study of electrode processes at carbon electrodes has great relevance to a variety of electrochemical applications. The wide range of carbon materials, their possible combination, the variability of electrode design and fabrication techniques, the specific application purposes, all these elements show the richness and complexity of this research area in electrochemistry. In particular, Activated Carbon (AC) electrodes are widely used for charge storage in supercapacitors and capacitive deionization cells. For their porous structure and surface characteristics, this class of electrodes may pose serious challenges to the capacity of routine electrochemical methods to achieve an in-depth analysis and the deconvolution of different electrode processes. A relatively new and interesting method, the Step Potential Electrochemical Spectroscopy (SPECS), has been shown to be an effective way to separate the contributions of faradaic and non-faradaic processes to the total current at AC electrodes1. The technique consists in applying to the working electrode (WE) a series of small potential steps and recording the current decay during a time interval long enough to allow for equilibration. Relatively simple models are fitted to the transients, to derive parameters of capacitive charging and faradaic processes. In the present work, we explore further the capability of SPECS to characterize electrode processes at AC electrodes, having in mind two objectives in particular: the determination of the Potential of Zero Charge (EPZC ) and the separation and possible identification of faradaic processes, through a closer examination of experimental data.AC (YEC-8A) paste electrodes (80% AC, 10% carbon black and 10% PTFE) on graphite current collector (130 μm thick foil) were used as WE in 0.1 M NaClaq electrolyte. The EPZC was determined as the minimum of differential capacitance vs. potential plot (single-frequency EIS measurement at 5 mHz). SPECS was performed over the potential window from –0.25 to 0.75 VSCE both in the anodic and cathodic direction, using a step of 25 mV and equilibration time of 300 s (sampling time 0.1 s). SPECS current transients are simulated by a two-exponential decay function with a residual current.Normalized differential capacitance curves from EIS and SPECS are shown in Figure 1a. The value of EPZC is found at about 0.175 and 0.190 VSCE by EIS and SPECS, respectively. Additionally, a good agreement is found between the absolute capacitance minimum determined by either technique at electrolyte concentration from 0.01 to 1.0 M, see inset of Figure 1a. The plot of residual currents vs. potential from the analysis of SPECS data is shown in Figure 1b. The trend of the currents, in both scan directions, highlights two “inversion” potentials: at about 0 VSCE, during forward polarization, and at about 0.57 VSCE, during backward polarization; in other words, the residual current is positive on the anodic side and negative on the cathodic side vs. the inversion potential, thus recreating the typical shape...

Drop-cast gold nanoparticles are not always electrocatalytically active for the borohydride oxidation reaction

“…65 This may be expected here, as a build-up of charge on both the NP and substrate will result in repulsive forces which will dislodge an improperly adhered particle, which may explain why the frequency/magnitude of the oscillation increases signicantly as the potential moves away from the potential of zero charge. 66,67 This further supports the above explanation for the origin of the abnormal result found in Fig. 7d.…”