2013
DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2013.759453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the Priorities and Practices of Virtual School Educators Using Action Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research studies have typically focused on questions concerning the relative effectiveness of online versus face-to-face classroom instruction, with some evidence indicating that online learning is often as effective as classroom learning, and that a blend of the two is more effective than either one alone (Means et al, 2010). Many more reports have been published since the 2010 meta-analysis by Means et al, including studies of such topics as factors that discriminate between dropouts and completers of online courses (e.g., Lee, Choi, & Kim, 2013), how to predict success in online learning (e.g., Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013), the impact of ethnic or minority status on participation in online education (e.g., Ke & Kwak, 2013), characteristics of participants in a MOOC (Breslow et al, 2013), and the priorities of online educators (e.g., Dawson, Dana, Wolkenhauer, & Krell, 2013). At the same time, “how-to” and popular books concerning various aspects of online learning and education have proliferated (e.g., Conrad & Donaldson, 2011; Khan, 2012; Thormann & Zimmerman, 2012; Vai & Sosulski, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research studies have typically focused on questions concerning the relative effectiveness of online versus face-to-face classroom instruction, with some evidence indicating that online learning is often as effective as classroom learning, and that a blend of the two is more effective than either one alone (Means et al, 2010). Many more reports have been published since the 2010 meta-analysis by Means et al, including studies of such topics as factors that discriminate between dropouts and completers of online courses (e.g., Lee, Choi, & Kim, 2013), how to predict success in online learning (e.g., Kruger-Ross & Waters, 2013), the impact of ethnic or minority status on participation in online education (e.g., Ke & Kwak, 2013), characteristics of participants in a MOOC (Breslow et al, 2013), and the priorities of online educators (e.g., Dawson, Dana, Wolkenhauer, & Krell, 2013). At the same time, “how-to” and popular books concerning various aspects of online learning and education have proliferated (e.g., Conrad & Donaldson, 2011; Khan, 2012; Thormann & Zimmerman, 2012; Vai & Sosulski, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An attempt to synthesise the best practices and standards for leading virtual schools could help pre-service administrator education programmes to better prepare their students to lead virtual schools. Finally, examination of experimental teacher education models focused on the preparation and professional development of virtual school teachers (e.g., Dawson, Dana, Wolkenhauer, & Krell, 2013;Kennedy, Cavanaugh, & Dawson, 2013) is also recommended to support the development of a professional development programme to better prepare virtual school leaders.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of teacher best practices to enhance and specialize a teacher's pedagogical strategy has long been encouraged (Healy & Welchert, 1990;Dawson et al, 2013). Indeed, for over a century and continuing into today, traditional brick-and-mortar elementary and secondary schools have reacted to our changing society by re-defining and adapting teacher best practices in an attempt to keep pace with societal needs and challenges (Feiman-Nemser, 1996;DiPietro, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%