Identity and difference – re-thinking UK South Asian entrepreneurship

Abstract

Purpose This paper, which is part of a larger study, aims to discuss from an ethno-cultural perspective, the notion of self-identification and difference pertaining to first and second-generation South Asian male entrepreneurs. In essence, previous studies have not explored this dimension to any sufficient depth. Therefore, evidence is unclear as to how ethno-culture has informed entrepreneurial identity and difference. Design/methodology/approach Adopting a phenomenological research paradigm, 42 semi-structured interviews were conducted with first- and second-generation Sikh and Pakistani Muslim male entrepreneurs in Greater London. A typology of second-generation entrepreneurs is developed and a research agenda proposed. Findings First-generation respondents regard the UK as home and do not suffer from shifts in identity. These particular respondents identify themselves as Sikh or Pakistani Muslim or a Businessman. However, the second-generation identify themselves via three distinct labels. Here respondents stress their ethnicity by using Hyphenated British identities or hide their ethnicity behind the term a Normal Businessman, or appear opportunists by using ethnicity as a resource to espouse a true entrepreneurial identity. Research limitations/implications The research environment within the Greater London area where the respondents are located may not be as generalisable when compared with other parts of the UK. Originality/value This paper offers a unique insight into self-prescribed identity and difference noted among London’s ethnic entrepreneurs.

Exploring innovation in challenging contexts: The experiences of ethnic minority restaurant owners during COVID-19

“…First, by bringing the idea of resilience in the innovation narrative, it complements research on forms of diversification in the ethnic minority entrepreneurship literature (Lassalle and Scott, 2018; Ram et al, 2001). Specific to ethnic minority entrepreneurs, innovation is also considered as part of the first and second-generation discussions (McPherson, 2017); diversifying the way literature has tended to see first and second-generation immigrants as distinctive in their ability and willingness to innovate. Second, it builds on the notion of early adopters (Rogers, 2003) to make a distinction between resistant and proactive entrepreneurs in terms of innovation.…”

“…Historically, in ethnic minority communities, these businesses have often been easier for migrants and ethnic minority entrepreneurs to enter, due to lower financial barriers to entry, and also because the ethnic minority entrepreneurs could rely on their communities for appropriate support (Lassalle, 2018), for example, in terms of supply chains, and to serve as their initial market (Aldrich and Waldinger, 1985). In the past, ethnic minority entrepreneurs have relied on long hours and family labour to establish themselves (Buettner, 2008; McPherson, 2017; Ram et al, 2001), with the unintended consequence of having little opportunities for sustained longer-term growth (Hack-Polay et al, 2020; Rahman et al, 2018), unless they engage into diversification activities in terms of attracting a wider customer base or by diversifying their product and service offering (Lassalle et al, 2021).…”

Understanding Entrepreneurial Intention: The Prediction of Entrepreneurial Behavior

“…Because self identity will increase the ability of employees to recognize and appreciate themselves as individuals themselves and there is no connection with the role of other individuals. In this case, self identity is an ability that involves entrepreneur freedom in expressing opinions and feelings that are different from other individuals (Mcpherson, 2016;Fernandes and Mota-ribeiro, 2017). Self identity arises when employees choose value and loyalty so that they have the authority to determine desired career choices in the future (Stewart and Hoell, 2016;Zhang and Chun, 2017).…”

Ethnography of Female Diaspora Networks: The Emerging Case of Pakistani Female Entrepreneurs in London

“…This scenario has implications for self-employment and the entrepreneurial aspirations of Pakistani females. Because of socially constructed gender roles, females are either a part of family business having no or little decision-making powers (Dhaliwal, 2000; Wellman & Wellman, 1992) in keeping with a ‘men manage and women work’ culture (McPherson, 2008). Self-employment for them is, therefore, tantamount to an expression of independence and the ‘breaking of traditional boundaries’.…”