Identity Construction in Elementary Readers and Writers

Abstract

S By examining the perspectives of students and others close to them, this study of 12 fifth graders from diverse backgrounds explores the role of literacy and curriculum in identity construction. Data collection included interviews with students, parents, the teacher, and peers; classroom observations; and analyses of student writing. Analyses of the data suggested that there was coherence of perspectives about six of the students while there was less agreement for six other students; perspective and context played more salient roles in some students' identity construction than in others. Second, literacy was a more important feature of some students' identities than others. For the avid and successful readers, literacy seemed to play a major role in how they viewed themselves. In contrast, reading and writing were not central for some students, generally the struggling, unsuccessful readers. Third, the literacy curriculum influenced students' identity construction, yet it did so in some unexpected ways. Students did not write the most revealing aspects of their identity in response to specific questions asked by the teacher, but found other avenues. Students evaluated their reading abilities and interests in terms of the school‐wide, computerized program, but used more complex criteria for describing themselves as writers in the absence of a less‐prescribed writing curriculum. Implications for practice include providing students with multiple opportunities to explore aspects of their identities, to legitimate their attempts to talk and write about issue of race and class in context, and to communicate frequently with parties close to the students. Other implications include reconceptualizing identity as a space where aspects of our private and public selves might blend or clash. En examinant les projets d'élèves et de certains de leurs proches, cette étude, qui porte sur 12 élèves de cinquième année d'origines diverses, explore le rôle de la littératie et des programmes dans la construction de l'identité. Les données recueillies comportaient des entretiens avec les élèves, les parents, le maître, des pairs, des observations faites en classe, ainsi que des analyses de productions écrites par ces élèves. L'analyse des données indique une cohérence de projet pour six de ces élèves mais moins de convergence pour les six autres; le projet et le contexte semblent avoir moins joué dans la construction de l'identité pour certains que pour d'autres. En second lieu, la littératie est une caractéristique de l'identité plus importante pour certains que pour d'autres. Pour les lecteurs motivés et ayant de bons résultats, la littératie semble jouer un rôle majeur dans la façon dont ils se voient eux‐mêmes. Par contre, la lecture et l'écriture ne sont pas centrales pour certains élèves, en général pour ceux qui ont des difficultés et de mauvais résultats. En troisième lieu, les programmes de lecture‐écriture ont un effet sur la construction de l'identité des élèves, bien que ce soit de façon inattendue. Les élèves n'o...

Scaffolding, Multiliteracies, and Reading Circles

“…Because learning is mediated through social interaction, student success and interest in literacy is dynamic and dependent on diverse contexts and partners, such as school peer groups, friendship groups, and family (McCarthy, 2001). Just as the participants in the study of Sanford and Blair (2004) developed literacy through guided peer participation in informal settings, Nicholas benefited from social interaction and tasks that were scaffolded in multiple contexts.…”

Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity

“…Gee and Crawford (1998) stated that we can take on different identities, depending upon the social setting, yet there are relationships between these identities. Continuing the metaphor, it can be concluded that the better the relationships between the different identities, the better the chorus of voices sounds (see also McCarthey, 2001).…”

Shaping our literate lives: Examining the role of literacy experiences in shaping positive literacy identities of doctoral students

“…The survey instrument was created by the researchers using current literature on literacy identity (Gee, 2006;McCarthey, 2001;Moje & Luke, 2009). The instrument was shared with three reviewers with expertise in literacy and/or identity research and revised based on their feedback in order to increase the content validity.…”

“…The semi-structured interview questions were grounded in literacy identity research (Gee, 2006;McCarthey, 2001;Moje & Luke, 2009) and sought to explore the relationship between participant's literacy histories and their literacy identities. The interviews ranged from 45 minutes to an hour and provided an opportunity to examine participant's literacy stories.…”