Identity reconciliation and knowledge mobilization in a mandated community of practice

Abstract

Purpose Communities of Practice (CoPs) are increasingly being created to facilitate knowledge mobilization in organizations. This paper aims to elucidate an underexplored aspect of participation in mandated CoPs – identity reconciliation. Specifically, the authors explore how actors reconcile their existing identities with becoming members of new knowledge mobilization CoPs. Design/methodology/approach The authors conducted a longitudinal qualitative case study over a 12-month period to explore identity reconciliation practices during the formation of the “ED CoP” – mandated by policymakers to mobilize knowledge between process improvement advisors and clinicians from various hospitals. Observation and interviews allowed us to uncover “front stage” and “backstage” practices of identity reconciliation. Findings The findings reveal two key unexpected modes of identity reconciliation – “distancing” and “peripheral lurking”. These modes resulted in different trajectories of participation of two of the key participant groups – “veteran” improvement advisors and “veteran” clinicians. Practical implications Different modes of identity reconciliation of different participants impact the formation of CoPs and how knowledge mobilization occurs within them. This paper offers a sensitizing lens for practitioners creating CoPs which enhances awareness of hidden identity practices, and recommendations to enable practitioners to effectively facilitate CoP formation. Originality/value This study suggests that identity reconciliation is an integral aspect of CoP formation, and essential for knowledge mobilization within CoPs. Whereas studies on CoPs in the knowledge management literature have mostly assumed that collaboration produces beneficial knowledge mobilization outcomes, the findings build a more nuanced picture of the processes involved in producing these outcomes.

Outcomes of co-designed communities of practice that support members to address public health issues

“…This extends insights from previous studies (e.g. Ivcovici et al , 2022 ), which suggested that reciprocity was particularly crucial for members with significant professional experience to avoid disengagement. Our findings show that most members, including facilitators, members with substantial professional experience and members with lived experience, shared their knowledge to receive support or gain benefits later.…”

Platform Matters: How Can Virtual Knowledge Communities Achieve Value Co-Creation Among Users in the Sharing Economy?

“…In this study, "Zhihu" was chosen as the case study as the single case can be extreme or unique and is more specific in suggesting that a paradigm mechanism, which is not representative of the majority of firms but leads to significant changes in the industry [14].…”

Knowledge Collaboration among Tax Professionals through the Lens of a Community of Practice

“…An often-neglected component of CoPs is identity formation, which occurs during knowledge construction, meaning making, and interaction (Evnitskaya and Morton 2011;Ivcovici et al 2021). Its success depends on the understanding of the connecting mechanisms between colleagues in a professional setting, such as organisational control, organisational opportunity, social networks, and non-person-centred approaches (Wanberg et al 2017).…”

“…Its success depends on the understanding of the connecting mechanisms between colleagues in a professional setting, such as organisational control, organisational opportunity, social networks, and non-person-centred approaches (Wanberg et al 2017). Continuous failure to appreciate this process can lead to unintended participation trajectories between experts and novices (Ivcovici et al 2021). Consequently, it can also affect the speed at which KC motivations and behaviours occur (Wang et al 2019).…”