2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-3926-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ideology, Agency, and Intercultural Communicative Competence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, they need to be able to interpret an occurrence or document from another culture, to explain it, and to relate it to another occurrence or document from their own culture (Bouchard, 2017). L2 educators also need to have the skill of interacting.…”
Section: How Do Educators Develop Intercultural Competence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, they need to be able to interpret an occurrence or document from another culture, to explain it, and to relate it to another occurrence or document from their own culture (Bouchard, 2017). L2 educators also need to have the skill of interacting.…”
Section: How Do Educators Develop Intercultural Competence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical conceptions hold that ideology is omnipresent, but is hidden in the margins of social life. As Bouchard (2017) notes, ideologies can be dangerous precisely because they inhabit worldviews in which they ‘have become naturalized and relatively invisible’ (p. 72). This can make the recognition and study of ideology challenging for researchers, and thus it is necessary to produce tools for doing so.…”
Section: Critical Conceptions Of Ideologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such scholarship, ELT is conceptualized as shaping and shaped by globalized and localized discourses regarding who people "are" and "can" and/or "should" be and become as English learners, users and instructors, and as members of Japanese society. Such work posits that ELT serves to perpetuate idealized and essentialized Japaneseness and the notion of a "homogenous" Japan, contrasted against an idealized Otherness/nativeness in English (e.g., Bouchard, 2017;Heinrich, 2012;Houghton & Rivers, 2013;Houghton, Rivers & Hashimoto, 2018;Kubota, 2002Kubota, , 2017Liddicoat, 2007;Rudolph, 2016;Toh, 2015Toh, , 2016Toh, , 2019. The findings from such scholarship include: *Privilege and marginalization manifest fluidly, and in diverse ways, in and across contexts and professional positions in "Japan," in the lives of teachers.…”
Section: Connecting With and Interpreting "History" (?)mentioning
confidence: 99%