Ideology and Effective Government: Lessons from Rudd–Gillard Labor

Abstract

Our democracy is predicated on voters choosing between political parties with competing ideologies that translate into different policy outcomes. Nonetheless, claims that ideology is of declining importance are common, and were a feature of the Rudd–Gillard Labor government. This paper seeks to examine the relationship between ideology and policy outcomes under that government. It defines Labor ideology by identifying the areas of consensus between three competing Labor traditions, and then examines the party's budget decisions on those policy areas. It finds that on the ideological consensus issues of income redistribution, public health and public education they implemented a substantial and coherent reform agenda consistent with Labor ideology. The consistency on the consensus issues contrasts with the ‘flip‐flopping’ on issues that were ideologically contested within the party, suggesting that far from being irrelevant, ideology was central to explaining both the strengths and weaknesses of Rudd–Gillard Labor.

Precision Teaching of Civics Integration in Universities and Primary Schools with Individual Differences in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

“…Boyce, B. explored the development of the legal field involving pornography in Japan, India, the U.S.A., and Canada, and through an in-depth investigation and analysis, it was learned that pornography-related laws, which have a limited role to play in the preservation of morality and healthy values, can become a political culture with power backing in the cultural and political fields [11]. Edwards et al explained that the process of people choosing political parties with ideological differences and contradictions reflects democracy and emphasizes the importance of ideological disputes [12]. Svensson, R. et al argued that factors such as family, school, and peers significantly influence the establishment of moral standards in adolescents [13].…”

Refining policies for financial stress

“…There is a strong culture of acceptance of the value of means testing among some segments of public administrators (Corr & Carey, 2017; Howard, 2001). Numerous types of welfare payments have been subject to means testing, such as private health and family support payments (Edwards, 2018). Whilst there is a long history of considering asset tests, income testing has been more likely to be binding in Australia (Marsh, 1985; Chomik & Piggott, 2016).…”