“…[ 3 ], and first proposed the "idiopathic calcium deposits of the scrotum" Their pathological analysis of the tissue did not reveal the cystic wall, mucosal epithelial tissue, or lipid-like components, so the disease is clinically difficult to diagnose and the condition requiring pathology for diagnosis is defined as idiopathic, which is different from multiple sebaceous cysts or adenomas, hence the name idiopathic calcium salt deposits of the scrotum. To the best of our knowledge, 18 literatures of idiopathic calcinosis of the scrotum having been reported from 1970 to the present in the literature ( Table 1 ) [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. The table compares the clinical features of 18 literatures, of which only 3 cases had histological findings epithelial lining.…”