2017
DOI: 10.4084/mjhid.2017.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idiopathic pulmonary embolism in a case of severe family ANKRD26 thrombocytopenia

Abstract: Venous thrombosis affecting thrombocytopenic patients is challenging. We report the case of a woman affected by deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in a thrombocytopenic context leading to the discovery of a heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding ankyrin repeat domain 26 (ANKRD26) associated with a heterozygous factor V (FV) Leiden mutation. This woman was diagnosed with lower-limb deep vein thrombosis complicated by pulmonary embolism. Severe thrombocytopenia was observed. The genetic study eviden… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple families with hereditary thrombocytopenia have been identified to have mutations within this same region of the 5′UTR. 7 - 18 Also, DNA sequence analysis of the APC gene demonstrated a variant of undetermined significance, which was a heterozygous sequence change located in the exon 16, c.4918 C>T.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple families with hereditary thrombocytopenia have been identified to have mutations within this same region of the 5′UTR. 7 - 18 Also, DNA sequence analysis of the APC gene demonstrated a variant of undetermined significance, which was a heterozygous sequence change located in the exon 16, c.4918 C>T.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to c. 473A > G, 11 other single nucleotide mutations within the 5 UTR mutation of ANKRD26 were confirmed to be pathogenic, they are c. Table 2). There was only one Noris et al, 2011;Pippucci et al, 2011;Perez Botero et al, 2015 c.-118 C > A 3(8) Noris et al, 2011Noris et al, , 2013Boutroux et al, 2015 C > G 1(1) Diep et al, 2019 C > T 7(25) Noris et al, 2011Noris et al, , 2013Pippucci et al, 2011;Marquez et al, 2014;Ouchi-Uchiyama et al, 2015;Diep et al, 2019 c. c.-125 T > G 3(5) Noris et al, 2011;Pippucci et al, 2011;Marconi et al, 2017 c.-126 T > C 1(7) Najm et al, 2013;Ventz et al, 2013 T > G 3(6) Noris et al, 2011Noris et al, , 2013 c.-127 A > G 3(13) Noris et al, 2011Noris et al, , 2013 A > T 8(30) Noris et al, 2011Noris et al, , 2013Pippucci et al, 2011;Boutroux et al, 2015;Vincenot et al, 2016 A > C 1(6) Guison et al, 2017 Del AT 1(6) Noris et al, 2013;Bluteau et al, 2014 c.-128 G > A 16(69) Noris et al, 2011Noris et al, , 2013Pippucci et al, 2011;Ferrari et al, 2016Ferrari et al, , 2017Zaninetti et al, 2017 G > C 2(4) Noris et al, 2013;…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 Quelques rapports de cas uniques indiquent que même en cas de thrombopénie marquée ou de déficit fonctionnel majeur, la survenue d'une thrombose est possible, plutôt alors dans le territoire veineux. 13,14 TRAITEMENT ANTITHROMBOTIQUE : RÈGLES DE BASE POUR UN RAISONNEMENT STRUCTURÉ L'évaluation de la balance risque-bénéfice d'un traitement antithrombotique chez les patients avec une diathèse hémorragipare constitutionnelle repose sur quelques considérations générales et règles de base. En tout premier lieu, le phénotype clinique hémorragique personnel (et familial) doit être attentivement (ré)évalué, au sein de la structure spécialisée dont ils relèvent.…”
Section: Thrombopénies Et Thrombopathies Constitutionnellesunclassified