Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) currently affects about 100 000 individuals in the US, and millions globally. Patients living with IPF experience disabling symptoms and progressive loss of lung function. 1 The 2 treatments approved by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat IPF, nintedanib and pirfenidone, slow disease progression but do not stop or reverse lung fibrosis. 2,3 Both drugs are poorly tolerated by a substantial number of patients, and use is further limited by high cost and lack of perceived benefit on symptoms and quality of life. Many patients with IPF are eager to participate in clinical trials. Yet in the era of approved antifibrotic therapy, patients and their physicians must consider how potential investigational drugs will fit into the current standard of care.In this issue of JAMA, the results from the ISABELA 1 and ISABELA 2 randomized clinical trials, 4 one of the first phase 3 clinical trial programs in IPF to be completed since the approval of nintedanib and pirfenidone, are presented. The 2 identically designed trials randomized a total of 1306 patients to 1 of 2 doses of oral ziritaxestat (an autotaxin inhibitor that lowers levels of lysophosphatidic acid, which is a profibrotic mediator) or placebo. The trials allowed the continuation or initiation of background antifibrotic therapy.The trials were terminated early after an interim analysis raised safety concerns and revealed a lack of efficacy in the treatment groups. Neither dose of ziritaxestat demonstrated any benefit on the rate of decline for forced vital capacity (FVC) over 52 weeks. There was no benefit on any of the reported secondary outcomes. In fact, time to first respiratory-related hospitalization, respiratory-related mortality, and first acute IPF exacerbation were all worse in the ziritaxestat groups. All-cause mortality was highest in the high-dose ziritaxestat group, and in the ISABELA 2 trial, all-cause mortality was double that of placebo. Respiratory-related deaths were the primary cause of death.The ISABELA trials highlight the complexity of conducting IPF clinical trials in the era of approved antifibrotic therapy. 5 Each trial had 3 groups: high-dose ziritaxestat (600 mg/d), lowdose ziritaxestat (200 mg/d), and placebo. It also had 3 standard of care treatment options: pirfenidone, nintedanib, and neither; there was approximately equal distribution of participants among these 3 options. The study was well designed and conducted. Participants were recruited from 227 sites in 26 countries. There were missed clinic visits due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but this does not seem to have impacted the results. The enrolled patients had a centrally reviewed diagnosis of IPF and mild to moderate disease. There was good target engagement. Despite early termination, the 15. Martinez FJ, Yow E, Flaherty KR, et al; CleanUP-IPF Investigators of the Pulmonary Trials Cooperative. Effect of antimicrobial therapy on respiratory hospitalization or death in adults with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: the CleanUP-IPF randomized...