Idiopathic versus Provoked Renal Infarction: Characteristics and Long-Term Follow-Up of a Cohort of Patients in a Tertiary Hospital

Abstract

Background: There is limited evidence on the etiology and outcomes of renal infarction. A provoking factor is identified only in one- to two-thirds of patients. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with acute renal infarction were studied; the sample was divided into two groups according to the presence of at least one provoking factor at the time of diagnosis (atrial fibrillation, flutter, major thrombophilia, or renal artery malformations). Results: The study comprised 59 patients with a mean age of 63 (±16.7) years and a follow-up period of 3.1 (±2.8) years. An identifiable provoking factor was found for 59.3% of the renal infarctions at the time of diagnosis, and atrial fibrillation was the most frequent one (in 49.2% of all patients). Renal impairment was found in 49.2% of the patients at diagnosis and in 50.8% of the patients 6 months after the event (p = 0.525). When compared with the idiopathic group, the patients with provoked infarction were older (69.8 vs. 57.9 years, p = 0.014) and had a higher rate of recurrence of arterial thrombosis during follow-up (18.8 vs. 0%, p = 0.028), but there were no differences in the rest of the baseline characteristics or in mortality rates. Six patients (10.2%) in the idiopathic group were diagnosed with atrial fibrillation during follow-up. Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation, both at diagnosis and at follow-up, is the most common identifiable cause of renal infarction; however, a significant number of patients are idiopathic, and these are younger, but they have a similar burden of cardiovascular disease and a lower risk of arterial recurrence.

A Case Report of a Young Female With Renal Infarction Secondary to Breakthrough COVID Infection

“…We advised at least three months of anticoagulation to our patient and close follow-up with her hematologist, regardless of the length of anticoagulation. This therapy has been related to improved survival and better outcomes [ 8 ].…”

Case Report: Acute Renal and Splenic Infarctions Secondary to Atrial Fibrillation

“…A retrospective study reported an additional 10% of the patients were identified with atrial fibrillation during follow-up, suggesting that patients with RI with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may be underrecognized by routine monitoring. Interestingly, the patients with provoked factors, such as atrial fibrillation had a higher rate of recurrence of arterial thrombosis, during follow-up ( 18 ). In a randomized clinical trial, among older community-dwelling individuals with hypertension, AF screening with a wearable cECG monitor was increased AF detection 10-fold and prompted the initiation of anticoagulant therapy in most cases.…”

A rare cause of abdominal pain managed unconventionally: acute renal infarction caused by atrial fibrillation: a case report

“…Incidence of renal infarction is only 0.007%, and is most commonly caused by embolism from AF [ 1 , 8 – 10 ]. Due to the rarity of ARI, there are only few reports on the effective therapeutic strategies to prevent kidney injury [ 3 ].…”

“…Due to the rarity of ARI, there are only few reports on the effective therapeutic strategies to prevent kidney injury [ 3 ]. ARI often leads to partial or complete renal injury [ 10 – 12 ]; therefore, prompt diagnosis and intervention are essential to prevent permanent ischemic damage [ 13 ]. The key to ARI treatment is to restore renal blood flow as soon as possible, and the treatment mainly includes anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and surgery.…”