The paper presents a case of 67-year-old man in whom coronarography was performed after positive exercise electrocardiography. During the angiography, extremely rare contrast reaction occured. Within the next few hours patient's clinical condition deteriorated significantly, so that he required special and atypical treatment. Finally, the patient recovered completely without any neurological or other deficits.Key words: coronarography, contrast reaction, adverse effects Cardiologica 2017; 12, 1: 78-80 Severe adverse effects after non-ionic contrast administration are very rare. It is estimated that these complications affect only about 0.031% of patients [1].
FoliaA 67-year-old man was admitted to the Department of Interventional Cardiology and Cardiac Arrhythmias due to long-term, recurrence retrosternal chest pain inducible by exercise. His medical history included hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus and an ischemic stroke that happened fourteen years ago without any residual effects. At admission the patient was in good general condition, his heart rate was regular at 70 bpm. Lung and heart sounds were clear, abdomen was soft and non-tender, with no organomegaly. He did not present any focal and generalized neurological symptoms. The resting electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed no abnormalities, without signs of acute or past ischemia. Markers of myocardial necrosis were negative.To support the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease, a non-invasive cardiac test -exercise ECG was conducted ( Figure 1). Because of unclear result (ECG positive, clinical negative), we decided to perform a coronarography with nonionic, low-osmolality contrast -Iomeron 400. The examination showed normal vessels, without any significant stenosis (Figures 2, 3).Fifteen minutes after the examination, sensory and motor aphasia without paresis occured. Then, patient presented strong psychomotor arousal and consciousness disorders. Urgent computed tomography (CT) was performed and did not reveal any bleeding or ischemic area. Within next few hours a rapid increase of patient's body temperature (over 40°C) was observed. Hyperthermia did not decrease after typical antipyretics. The mechanical cooling (wrap with ice bags, stomach and bladder rinsing