1988
DOI: 10.1128/iai.56.6.1407-1413.1988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idiotypic vaccines and infectious diseases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1989
1989
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore the anti-idiotypic antibodies were induced in BALB/c mice against MoAbs of BALB/c mice origin [17], So we conclude that with the NI-EIA antiidiotypic antibodies are determined against all or a part ofthe idiotypic determinants (idiotopes) of the SFV-neutralizing antibodies. Monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies, especially those (Ab2/J) carrying the internal image (paratope) of the antigen (epitope), are of interest as potential vaccines against pathogenic micro-organisms [6,13,15,20], The anti-idiotypic sera described in this paper abrogate the neutralizing capacity of SFV-specific MoAbs, This could be due to Ab^fi anti-idiotypic antibodies which bind to the antigen binding site (paratope). However, very likely other anti-idiotypic antibodies (e,g, Ab2a) inhibit neutralization by steric hindrance or even by mere aggregation of neutralizing MoAbs [19], The observation that anti-idiotypic sera inhibit specifically the neutralization ofa virus is not a unique finding, Gheuens et al [12] have described that mouse measles haemagglutinin-specific MoAbs are inhibited in their neutralizing activity by mouse anti-idiotypic serum as indicated by diminished neutralization of measles virus in a plaque reduction test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore the anti-idiotypic antibodies were induced in BALB/c mice against MoAbs of BALB/c mice origin [17], So we conclude that with the NI-EIA antiidiotypic antibodies are determined against all or a part ofthe idiotypic determinants (idiotopes) of the SFV-neutralizing antibodies. Monoclonal anti-idiotypic antibodies, especially those (Ab2/J) carrying the internal image (paratope) of the antigen (epitope), are of interest as potential vaccines against pathogenic micro-organisms [6,13,15,20], The anti-idiotypic sera described in this paper abrogate the neutralizing capacity of SFV-specific MoAbs, This could be due to Ab^fi anti-idiotypic antibodies which bind to the antigen binding site (paratope). However, very likely other anti-idiotypic antibodies (e,g, Ab2a) inhibit neutralization by steric hindrance or even by mere aggregation of neutralizing MoAbs [19], The observation that anti-idiotypic sera inhibit specifically the neutralization ofa virus is not a unique finding, Gheuens et al [12] have described that mouse measles haemagglutinin-specific MoAbs are inhibited in their neutralizing activity by mouse anti-idiotypic serum as indicated by diminished neutralization of measles virus in a plaque reduction test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another difference between the anti-id caries immunization (11) and our present data is the fact that both the rat antistreptococcal id Abs and the corresponding rabbit anti-id Abs were polyclonal and hence much more complex and less characterized, whereas both our id MAbl and anti-id MAb2 were well-defined MAbs. Furthermore, the presence of an internal image in the antistreptococcal anti-id Abs was deduced only from the fact that these injected Ab2's induced some protection, both by Since several authors agree that Ab2a and Ab2-y anti-id Abs can also immunize, without, however, providing details on protection (10,38), the question of whether the polyclonal anti-id Ab2s in that study (11) really contained some Ab2,B remains unanswered. Finally, purification and characterization of the rat antistreptococcal Ab3 was not examined in that study (11), whereas we demonstrated, by several tests, a large similarity of reaction between the rat serum anti-CT Ab3 and mouse MAbl, as expected from the id-anti-id network theory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The development of antiviral autoantibodies that bind target cell molecules, in addition to the appearance of anti-Ids that mimic crucial target cell antigens, could be damaging to the host. The triggering of antiviral antibody by anti-Id pulsed B cells or splenocytes, while being fundamentally a protective response, can be detrimental to possible cross-reactivity against myocyte antigen(s), the generation of auto-anti-Ids with mimicry for virus or tissue determinants, and the possibility of triggering other immunoregulatory cells to react against self-components (1,4,6,7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%