2020
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbaa341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iDMer: an integrative and mechanism-driven response system for identifying compound interventions for sudden virus outbreak

Abstract: Emerging viral infections seriously threaten human health globally. Several challenges exist in identifying effective compounds against viral infections: (1) at the initial stage of a new virus outbreak, little information, except for its genome information, may be available; (2) although the identified compounds may be effective, they may be toxic in vivo and (3) cytokine release syndrome (CRS) triggered by viral infections is the primary cause of mortality. Currently, an integrative to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, COPS3 may regulate the development of T2DM through the Raf-1/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and autophagy regulation. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 can hinder autophagy by blocking autophagosome-lysosome fusion ( Miao et al, 2021 ), and activation of autophagy can inhibit the replication and spread of SARS-CoV-2 ( Gassen et al, 2021 ; Wei et al, 2021 ). Thus, COPS3 may regulate the development of COVID-19 by modulating autophagy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, COPS3 may regulate the development of T2DM through the Raf-1/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and autophagy regulation. Additionally, SARS-CoV-2 can hinder autophagy by blocking autophagosome-lysosome fusion ( Miao et al, 2021 ), and activation of autophagy can inhibit the replication and spread of SARS-CoV-2 ( Gassen et al, 2021 ; Wei et al, 2021 ). Thus, COPS3 may regulate the development of COVID-19 by modulating autophagy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ProTox-II extracts various toxicological parameters from the compounds’ SMILES representation to predict acute oral toxicity (LD50, mg/kg) and several toxicity end points, including carcinogenicity, immunotoxicity, mutagenicity, and cytotoxicity, and it ranks the acute toxicity of each compound in six classes, namely, Fatal (Class-1), Fatal (Class-2), Toxic (Class-3), Harmful (Class-4), May be harmful (Class-5), and Non-toxic (Class-6). According to previous research ( Wei et al, 2021 ), a compound in an acute toxicity class lower than Class-3 and with more than three active toxicity end points is considered to be toxic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ProTox-II classifies the acute toxicity of each compound from 1 to 6, corresponding to lethal, lethal, toxic, harmful, possibly harmful, and non-toxic. According to literature [40,41], compounds with acute toxicity levels below grade 3 and greater than three positive toxicity endpoints are considered toxic. Therefore, 35 components of LWDHP were non-toxic, among which 15 components had no positive toxicological end points, 6 components had 2 positive toxicological end points, and 14 components had 1 positive toxicological end point (Figure 1).…”
Section: Safety Evaluation Of Chemical Constituents Of Lwdhpmentioning
confidence: 99%