2018 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology (CVCBT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cvcbt.2018.00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IDMoB: IoT Data Marketplace on Blockchain

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, DLT-based data markets provide the ability to create economic incentives, which could not only stimulate the democratization of access to extant, high-quality AI training data (i.e., addressing the training data availability tension) but as well encourage greater participation by the general public to drive the generation of new, more diverse data sets (i.e., addressing the training data bias tension). However, despite first technical solutions being developed by researchers from the IS, computer science, and related disciplines (Ozercan et al 2018;Özyilmaz et al 2018;Xiong and Xiong 2019;Zhao et al 2019), the question of how to effectively design token economies (e.g., to democratize data access or to encourage the generation of more diverse data sets) remains a focal theme of contemporary DLT research. Adding to this, several researchers have raised concerns over the potential consequences of over-emphasizing economic incentives for the sharing of personal data because they could especially motivate those in need to share their data and without making Table 4 Fruitful avenues of future research on the DLT-based realization of TAI, related tensions, and exemplary research questions…”
Section: Dlt-based Data Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DLT-based data markets provide the ability to create economic incentives, which could not only stimulate the democratization of access to extant, high-quality AI training data (i.e., addressing the training data availability tension) but as well encourage greater participation by the general public to drive the generation of new, more diverse data sets (i.e., addressing the training data bias tension). However, despite first technical solutions being developed by researchers from the IS, computer science, and related disciplines (Ozercan et al 2018;Özyilmaz et al 2018;Xiong and Xiong 2019;Zhao et al 2019), the question of how to effectively design token economies (e.g., to democratize data access or to encourage the generation of more diverse data sets) remains a focal theme of contemporary DLT research. Adding to this, several researchers have raised concerns over the potential consequences of over-emphasizing economic incentives for the sharing of personal data because they could especially motivate those in need to share their data and without making Table 4 Fruitful avenues of future research on the DLT-based realization of TAI, related tensions, and exemplary research questions…”
Section: Dlt-based Data Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incentivize participation with high quality data, Harris and Waggoner [73] propose staking mechanisms in which malicious participants sharing spam models lose their stake. Such systems can be applied in the Internet of Things industry in general [72].…”
Section: ) Smart Contractsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the proposal of a blockchain based architecture where data is the main focus. In the case of data sharing restricted by payment, a basis for a marketplace is needed, such as the systems presented in [23], [24] that are backed by blockchains for IoT infrastructures and smart cities.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%