2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2016.7799027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

iDroop: A Dynamic Droop controller to decouple power grid's steady-state and dynamic performance

Abstract: This paper presents a novel Dynam-i-c Droop (iDroop) control mechanism to perform primary frequency control with gird-connected inverters that improves the network dynamic performance. The work is motivated by the dynamic degradation experienced by the power grid due to the increase in asynchronous inverted-based generation. We show that the widely suggested virtual inertia solution suffers from unbounded noise amplification (infinite H2 norm) when measurement noise is considered. This suggests that virtual in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits of load-side controllers motivated a series of work on understanding how different system parameters and controller designs impact the grid transient performance. For instance, iDroop is proposed in [14] to improve dynamic performance of the power system through controlling power Linqi The authors thank Janusz Bialek and Oleg Khamisov from Skoltech for helpful discussions. This work has been supported by Resnick Research Fellowship, Linde Institute Research Award, DOE through the ENERGISE program (Award #DE-EE-0007998), NSF grants through CCF 1637598, ECCS 1619352, CNS 1545096, ARPA-E grant through award de-ar0000699 (NODES) and GRID DATA, DTRA through grant HDTRA 1-15-1-0003 and Skoltech through collaboration agreement 1075-MRA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of load-side controllers motivated a series of work on understanding how different system parameters and controller designs impact the grid transient performance. For instance, iDroop is proposed in [14] to improve dynamic performance of the power system through controlling power Linqi The authors thank Janusz Bialek and Oleg Khamisov from Skoltech for helpful discussions. This work has been supported by Resnick Research Fellowship, Linde Institute Research Award, DOE through the ENERGISE program (Award #DE-EE-0007998), NSF grants through CCF 1637598, ECCS 1619352, CNS 1545096, ARPA-E grant through award de-ar0000699 (NODES) and GRID DATA, DTRA through grant HDTRA 1-15-1-0003 and Skoltech through collaboration agreement 1075-MRA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , n − 1; (13) we note they are all stable except forh 0 (s) = g 0 (s)/s. This suggests the following decomposition:…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Our results lend support for this control strategy for improving synchronization in future power networks. If more active control is enabled, one could choose to go beyond the emulation of physical parameters such as damping or inertia, and use a more general dynamic controller; indeed such approaches are also being considered [13], [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where y i (t) is the system output corresponding to disturbance vector u i (t). Instead of evaluating the expectation in (7) or the time integral in (8), the H 2 -norm for system H can be expressed as [22,Ch. 5]…”
Section: Relation To Stability Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%