2018
DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Idylla assay and next generation sequencing: an integrated EGFR mutational testing algorithm

Abstract: AimsAny reference laboratory testing non-small cell lung cancer samples for predictive biomarkers needs to develop and validate a wide range of different molecular techniques, each with a specific time requirement and application. Updated international guidelines suggest that next generation sequencing (NGS) to be the initial procedure. However, in a non-negligible subset of cases, library generation may fail or amplicon coverage may be insufficient. In these NGS ‘inv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the rapid Idylla EGFR mutation test has proven to be very sensitive for the detection of EGFR hotspot mutations in FFPE tissue and cell blocks. To the best of our knowledge, only six other studies have investigated the performance of the rapid EGFR Idylla mutation test 8 16–18 24 25. In this study, we obtained an overall 94% agreement for the NSCLC cases between NGS and Idylla, which is comparable with the other recent publications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the rapid Idylla EGFR mutation test has proven to be very sensitive for the detection of EGFR hotspot mutations in FFPE tissue and cell blocks. To the best of our knowledge, only six other studies have investigated the performance of the rapid EGFR Idylla mutation test 8 16–18 24 25. In this study, we obtained an overall 94% agreement for the NSCLC cases between NGS and Idylla, which is comparable with the other recent publications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…We analysed all peer-reviewed literature on the use of the Idylla platform in all tumours in which mutational status is required for treatment of the patient (table 1). 2–25…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many institutions all over the world have adopted this approach to rapidly assess the most common actionable oncogenes in a wide range of human neoplasms. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Acute deteriorating patients can be immediately treated and predictive biomarker testing can be carried out even where equipment and expertise are not available. 26 A recently developed combined NRAS-BRAF Mutation Test has only been applied to CRC and melanoma, to inform on targeted treatment response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Indeed, the single-use Idylla (Biocartis, Mechelen, Belgium) cartridge includes all reagents needed to detect the V-Raf Murine Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog B1 (BRAF) p.V600E and Neuroblastoma RAS Viral (V-Ras) Oncogene Homolog (NRAS) gene mutations. [10][11][12][13][14] These are the most frequent ones harbored by thyroid neoplasms. 15 The cytopathologist should simply insert the needle rinse into the cartridge; this latter, then, is loaded into the Idylla platform and an integrated console auto-analyzes the real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) amplification curves, giving to the cytopathologist the final results on the screen as either "No mutation detected" or "BRAF or NRAS mutation detected", in less than 2 hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform molecular testing, we have recently developed a NGS panel (SiRe®) that covers 568 mutations in 42 amplicons (ranging from 125 to 175 bp) of genes – including EGFR , KRAS , NRAS , and BRAF – involved in the treatment choice for lung ADC [5]. As has previously been shown, our gene panel is also suitable for cytological samples [6]. Adopting this panel in our routine practice, we identified 14 BRAF -mutated cases from 294 lung cancer patients (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%