IEEE 802.11ax: How to Build High Efficiency WLANs

Khorov, Evgeny; Kiryanov, Anton; Lyakhov, Andrey

doi:10.1109/ent.2015.23

Cited by 34 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Using Equations (4) and (5) the search for the optimal A-MPDU can consider only the number X of MPDUs and the number Y of MSDUs per MPDU that maintain Equation (5). We can therefore re-write Equation (3) as:…”

Section: Unreliable Channel Ber >mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Single User MAC Level Throughput Comparision: IEEE 802.11ax vs. IEEE 802.11ac

Sharon¹,

Alpert²

2017

WSN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the ever-increasing range of video and audio applications in portable handheld devices, demand for high throughput in Wi-Fi networks is escalating. In this paper we introduce several novel features defined in next generation WLAN, termed as IEEE 802.11ax standard, and compare between the maximum throughputs received in IEEE 802.11ax and IEEE 802.11ac in a scenario where the AP continuously transmits to one station in the Single User mode. The comparison is done as a function of the modulation/coding schemes in use. In IEEE 802.11ax we consider two levels of frame aggregation. IEEE 802.11ax outperforms IEEE 802.11ac by about 29% and 48% in reliable and unreliable channels respectively.

show abstract

Section: Unreliable Channel Ber >mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…IEEE 802.11ax is a sixth generation of WLAN in the IEEE 802.11 set of WLANs [1] and it is a successor to IEEE O. Sharon, Y. Alpert 802.11ac [3] [4]. IEEE 802.11ax is predicted to have maximum capacity of around 9.5 Gbps in 2.4 and/or 5 GHz and has the goal of providing 4 times the throughput of IEEE 802.11ac [5] [6] [7] [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Single User MAC Level Throughput Comparision: IEEE 802.11ax vs. IEEE 802.11ac

Sharon¹,

Alpert²

2017

WSN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…PHY and MAC layers that enable at least four-fold improvement in the average throughput per station in densely deployed networks [5][6][7][8]. Currently IEEE 802.11ax project is finalizing revision 2.0, which will be the baseline for WFA IEEE 802.11ax certification.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimizing TCP Goodput and Delay in next generation IEEE 802.11 (ax) devices

Sharon

Alpert

2018

TNC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper we suggest three scheduling strategies for the IEEE 802.11ax transmission of DL unidirectional TCP data from the Access Point to stations. Two strategies are based on the Single User operation mode and one is based on the Multi User operation mode, using Multi User Multiple-Input-Multiple-Output (MU-MIMO) and OFDMA. We measure the Goodput of the system as a function of the time intervals over which these Goodputs are received in all three strategies. For up to 8 stations the MU strategy outperforms the SU. For 16 and 32 stations it is not clear whether MU outperforms SU or vice versa. For 64 stations the SU strategies outperform the MU significantly. We also checked the influence of the Delayed Acks feature on the received Goodputs and found that this feature has significance only when the TCP data segments are relatively short.

show abstract

“…Studies show that for Wi-Fi networks centralized approaches using global network knowledge can outperform channel assignment based on limited local knowledge [3]. However, other Wi-Fi aspects also require centralized coordination including radio configuration (e.g., setting the optimal transmission power [4]) and medium access optimization (e.g., controlling the carrier sensing threshold [5]), which are usually considered on a local (per-AP) scale.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

CADWAN: A Control Architecture for Dense WiFi Access Networks

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The growing demands of ubiquitous computing are leading towards the densification of wireless access networks. The challenges of high density deployments can be addressed by networkwide centralized control. To this end we propose CADWAN -a Control Architecture for efficient management of Dense Wi-Fi Access Networks. Its main advantages are: flexibility (it supports softwaredefined wireless networking), scalability (it uses a three-tier optimization framework), and extendibility (it exploits a unified control interface with support for heterogeneous devices). Furthermore, CADWAN is complementary to ongoing developments in IEEE 802.11, especially 802.11ax.

show abstract

IEEE 802.11ax: How to Build High Efficiency WLANs

Cited by 34 publications

References 2 publications

Single User MAC Level Throughput Comparision: IEEE 802.11ax vs. IEEE 802.11ac

Single User MAC Level Throughput Comparision: IEEE 802.11ax vs. IEEE 802.11ac

Optimizing TCP Goodput and Delay in next generation IEEE 802.11 (ax) devices

CADWAN: A Control Architecture for Dense WiFi Access Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About